Sorry it took this long. Only very small things now:
1) I don't think considering both z and Z is necessary.
2) Please use multiple "=="s instead of using "in". Yes, I'm aware this is less pythonic, but it's still better than inconsistency in a single point.
3) There is an extra linebreak at the end, after the redo method.
I promise the next version will not take more than one day!
« Back to merge proposal
Sorry it took this long. Only very small things now:
1) I don't think considering both z and Z is necessary.
2) Please use multiple "=="s instead of using "in". Yes, I'm aware this is less pythonic, but it's still better than inconsistency in a single point.
3) There is an extra linebreak at the end, after the redo method.
I promise the next version will not take more than one day!