Merge lp:~jml/pkgme/build-source-package into lp:pkgme
Proposed by
Jonathan Lange
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | James Westby |
Approved revision: | 92 |
Merged at revision: | 72 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~jml/pkgme/build-source-package |
Merge into: | lp:pkgme |
Diff against target: |
179 lines (+101/-10) 5 files modified
pkgme/bin/main.py (+23/-5) pkgme/debuild.py (+34/-0) pkgme/errors.py (+5/-0) pkgme/testing.py (+15/-0) pkgme/tests/test_script.py (+24/-5) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~jml/pkgme/build-source-package |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
James Westby | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+69498@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
Does what it says on the packet.
To post a comment you must log in.
6 -test_command= python -m subunit.run $IDLIST PYTHONPATH= `pwd` python -m subunit.run $IDLIST
7 +test_command=
Is that not implicit?
41 + stdout, stderr = proc.communicate()
Perhaps we want to do something with the returncode? Also reporting the
stdout, stderr if it fails?
Also, I think it should use that new logging framework that some bright spark
wrote to log a message about what it is doing.
We're going to want to do something with GPG keys as well, but I'm fine deferring
that for now.
Thanks,
James