lp:~jml/pkgme-devportal/remove-ldd

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Merged into lp:pkgme-devportal at revision 21

James Westby: Approve on 2011-12-08

Diff: 128 lines (+2/-95)

2 files modified

devportalbinary/binary.py (+2/-57)
devportalbinary/tests/test_binary.py (+0/-38)

api

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Bug #901439: ldd tests fail on lucid

High

Fix Released

Link a bug report

Related blueprints

19. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-12-08

Don't need this strategy pattern any more.

18. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-12-08

Remove ldd code. It's unused and causing bugs like #901439

17. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-11-23

Better error when no binaries found.
Specify dependencies in full.

16. By James Westby on 2011-11-21

Add some acceptance tests.

15. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-11-21

Use 'env' for Python, rather than system python

14. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-11-18

Add a setup.py file, use entry points to advertise the package

13. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-10-25

Fetch symbols files from binary packages rather than trunk.

12. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-10-24

Build and use a proper symbol database, rather than the hacky mole code.

Adds a script, bin/fetch-symbol-files that fetches symbol files for a
particular source package. When hooked up to a system for scanning all of
Ubuntu (e.g. lp:udd), this script will build up a database mapping library
names to dependencies.

Changes the dependency guessing code to use this database, rather than the
mole database.

Deletes the mole code.

Adds more infrastructure for testing and configuration. Specifically for
choosing which database that we're using.

11. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-09-15

Fix tests to match correct behaviour.

10. By Jonathan Lange on 2011-09-12

Do not need