Merge lp:~jml/bzr/rubberstamp into lp:bzr

[Jonathan Lange]

Set approved revision and vote "Approve" when using lp-propose --approve

The common use case for me using lp-propose --approve is when I'm creating a merge proposal that will then be taken up by another system, like tarmac, for processing and landing.

This branch caters to that use case by voting "Approve" and by setting the approved revision. Both of these enable the default tarmac set up to land the merge proposal. Altogether, this makes 'lp-propose --approve' something of a rubberstamping operation.

[Martin Pool (mbp)]

That seems like a good feature? Could anyone be surprised by the change and
want the old behavior? Maybe not.

It should be in NEWS.

  vote approve
On 23 Oct 2012 03:30, "Jonathan Lange" <email address hidden> wrote:

> Jonathan Lange has proposed merging lp:~jml/bzr/rubberstamp into lp:bzr.
>
> Commit message:
> Set approved revision and vote "Approve" when using lp-propose --approve
>
> Requested reviews:
> bzr-core (bzr-core)
>
> For more details, see:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~jml/bzr/rubberstamp/+merge/130850
>
> The common use case for me using lp-propose --approve is when I'm creating
> a merge proposal that will then be taken up by another system, like tarmac,
> for processing and landing.
>
> This branch caters to that use case by voting "Approve" and by setting the
> approved revision. Both of these enable the default tarmac set up to land
> the merge proposal. Altogether, this makes 'lp-propose --approve'
> something of a rubberstamping operation.
>
>
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~jml/bzr/rubberstamp/+merge/130850
> Your team bzr-core is requested to review the proposed merge of
> lp:~jml/bzr/rubberstamp into lp:bzr.
>
> === modified file 'bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/cmds.py'
> --- bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/cmds.py 2012-07-23 19:19:05 +0000
> +++ bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/cmds.py 2012-10-22 16:29:21 +0000
> @@ -293,7 +293,8 @@
> Option('message', short_name='m', type=unicode,
> help='Commit message.'),
> Option('approve',
> - help='Mark the proposal as approved
> immediately.'),
> + help=('Mark the proposal as approved
> immediately, '
> + 'setting the approved revision to
> tip.')),
> Option('fixes', 'The bug this proposal fixes.', str),
> ListOption('review', short_name='R', type=unicode,
> help='Requested reviewer and optional type.')]
>
> === modified file 'bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/lp_propose.py'
> --- bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/lp_propose.py 2012-02-26 15:43:02 +0000
> +++ bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/lp_propose.py 2012-10-22 16:29:21 +0000
> @@ -137,6 +137,15 @@
> })
> return body
>
> + def get_source_revid(self):
> + """Get the revision ID of the source branch."""
> + source_branch = self.source_branch.bzr
> + source_branch.lock_read()
> + try:
> + return source_branch.last_revision()
> + finally:
> + source_branch.unlock()
> +
> def check_proposal(self):
> """Check that the submission is sensible."""
> if self.source_branch.lp.self_link ==
> self.target_branch.lp.self_link:
> @@ -180,6 +189,15 @@
> error_lines.append(line)
> raise Exception(''.join(error_lines))
>
> + def approve_proposal(self, mp):
> + revid = self.get_source_revid()
> + self.call_webservice(
> + mp.createComment,
> + vote=u'Approve',
> + subject='', # Use the default subject.
> + content=u"Rubberstamp! Proposer approve...

review: Approve

[Jonathan Lange (jml)]

On 22 October 2012 19:26, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
> Review: Approve
>

Thanks!

> That seems like a good feature? Could anyone be surprised by the change and
> want the old behavior? Maybe not.
>

That's my thinking. Complete with question marks.

> It should be in NEWS.
>

Which NEWS file?

jml

[Martin Pool (mbp)]

>Which NEWS file?

I really mean doc/en/release-notes/bzr-2.6.txt, which we merged NEWS into.

--
Martin

[lp:~jml/bzr/rubberstamp]

6576. By Jonathan Lange on 2012-10-23

NEWS update

[Jonathan Lange (jml)]

NEWS has been updated. What else needs to happen before this gets merged?

[Martin Pool (mbp)]

I think you have commit rights? Please go ahead and merge it.

Martin

[Jonathan Lange (jml)]

I don't know how to tell if I have commit rights. My pqm-submit failed with being unable to verify the key. Have asked mgz on IRC to merge.

[Jonathan Lange (jml)]

sent to pqm by email

[Martin Packman (gz)]

sent to pqm by email

=== modified file 'bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/cmds.py'
--- bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/cmds.py	2012-07-23 19:19:05 +0000
+++ bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/cmds.py	2012-10-23 10:25:24 +0000
@@ -293,7 +293,8 @@
                      Option('message', short_name='m', type=unicode,
                             help='Commit message.'),
                      Option('approve',
-                            help='Mark the proposal as approved immediately.'),
+                            help=('Mark the proposal as approved immediately, '
+                                  'setting the approved revision to tip.')),
                      Option('fixes', 'The bug this proposal fixes.', str),
                      ListOption('review', short_name='R', type=unicode,
                             help='Requested reviewer and optional type.')]

=== modified file 'bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/lp_propose.py'
--- bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/lp_propose.py	2012-02-26 15:43:02 +0000
+++ bzrlib/plugins/launchpad/lp_propose.py	2012-10-23 10:25:24 +0000
@@ -137,6 +137,15 @@
             })
         return body
 
+    def get_source_revid(self):
+        """Get the revision ID of the source branch."""
+        source_branch = self.source_branch.bzr
+        source_branch.lock_read()
+        try:
+            return source_branch.last_revision()
+        finally:
+            source_branch.unlock()
+
     def check_proposal(self):
         """Check that the submission is sensible."""
         if self.source_branch.lp.self_link == self.target_branch.lp.self_link:
@@ -180,6 +189,15 @@
                 error_lines.append(line)
             raise Exception(''.join(error_lines))
 
+    def approve_proposal(self, mp):
+        revid = self.get_source_revid()
+        self.call_webservice(
+            mp.createComment,
+            vote=u'Approve',
+            subject='', # Use the default subject.
+            content=u"Rubberstamp! Proposer approves of own proposal.")
+        self.call_webservice(mp.setStatus, status=u'Approved', revid=revid)
+
     def create_proposal(self):
         """Perform the submission."""
         prerequisite_branch = self._get_prerequisite_branch()
@@ -203,7 +221,7 @@
             commit_message=self.commit_message, reviewers=reviewers,
             review_types=review_types)
         if self.approve:
-            self.call_webservice(mp.setStatus, status='Approved')
+            self.approve_proposal(mp)
         if self.fixes:
             if self.fixes.startswith('lp:'):
                 self.fixes = self.fixes[3:]

=== modified file 'doc/en/release-notes/bzr-2.6.txt'
--- doc/en/release-notes/bzr-2.6.txt	2012-10-13 15:05:46 +0000
+++ doc/en/release-notes/bzr-2.6.txt	2012-10-23 10:25:24 +0000
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
 
 .. These may require users to change the way they use Bazaar.
 
+* ``bzr lp-propose --approve`` now also adds an "Approve" vote to the merge
+  proposal.  (Jonathan Lange)
+
 New Features
 ************
 
@@ -43,7 +46,12 @@
 
 * Local configurations files (i.e. accessed on the local file system like
   ``bazaar.conf`` and ``locations.conf``) are now shared, reducing the
-  number of IOs when querying a configuation option. (Vincent Ladeuil, #832042)
+  number of IOs when querying a configuation option. (Vincent Ladeuil,
+  #832042)
+
+* ``bzr lp-propose --approve`` now correctly specifies the approved revision
+  and provides an "Approve" vote from the proposer, allowing for smoother
+  interaction with downstream merge tools.  (Jonathan Lange)
 
 Bug Fixes
 *********