Merge lp:~jelmer/launchpad/635591-sync-source-unicode into lp:launchpad
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Robert Collins on 2010-09-16 |
| Approved revision: | no longer in the source branch. |
| Merged at revision: | 11565 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~jelmer/launchpad/635591-sync-source-unicode |
| Merge into: | lp:launchpad |
| Diff against target: |
62 lines (+27/-1) 2 files modified
lib/lp/soyuz/scripts/ftpmaster.py (+1/-1) lib/lp/soyuz/scripts/tests/test_sync_source.py (+26/-0) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~jelmer/launchpad/635591-sync-source-unicode |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Collins (community) | Approve on 2010-09-16 | ||
| Launchpad code reviewers | code | 2010-09-16 | Pending |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Fix handling of empty lines in sync source (regression from fix for bug 635591).
Description of the Change
I found an issue with my fix for bug 635591 when I QA'ed it.
If the changelog entry contains white lines then no new fields will be parsed. Since the Files section was added after the Changes section this meant that the Files section would be ignored in some cases.
This branch adds a test for changelog entries with empty lines and moves the Files section up in the file to cope with this bug.
| Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) wrote : | # |
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote : | # |
Something is funny with the bug/branch info here; the older MP isn't linked, the bug isn't qa-bad or qa-needstesting marked. Could you please put a bug together for why the older MP wasn't linked from the branch anymore?
| Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) wrote : | # |
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 19:08 +0000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Something is funny with the bug/branch info here; the older MP isn't
> linked, the bug isn't qa-bad or qa-needstesting marked. Could you
> please put a bug together for why the older MP wasn't linked from the
> branch anymore?
I think the qa-needstesting wasn't there because I QA'ed it on dogfood
very quickly after it landed on devel, the QA bot probably just hadn't
run yet in that time period.
Bug 640810 has been filed about the missing link to the older MP on the
branch page.
Cheers,
Jelmer

FWIW, I'm also filing a bug against python-debian about this issue.