Code review comment for lp:~jelmer/bzr/move-interbranch-fetch2

Revision history for this message
Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) wrote :

On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 15:31 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> Andrew-
> Can you look at this one? I'm not sure that I prefer this method. I
> think it is fine to change how we search for items, but I felt that
> FetchSpec was the more generic interface.
FWIW The generic interface is still usable, it just requires you to call
fetch on the repository rather than on the branch.

Cheers,

Jelmer

> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Merge] lp:~jelmer/bzr/move-interbranch-fetch2 into lp:bzr
> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:18:05 -0000
> From: Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden>
> Reply-To: <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>, Andrew Bennetts
> <email address hidden>
>
> Jelmer Vernooij has proposed merging
> lp:~jelmer/bzr/move-interbranch-fetch2 into lp:bzr with
> lp:~jelmer/bzr/move-interbranch-fetch1 as a prerequisite.
>
> Requested reviews:
> bzr-core (bzr-core)
> Andrew Bennetts (spiv): code
> Related bugs:
> Bug #741760 in Bazaar: ""bzr merge" always looks at revision graph"
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/741760
>
> For more details, see:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~jelmer/bzr/move-interbranch-fetch2/+merge/54958
>
> Make Branch.fetch() take a fetch_tags argument rather than fetch_spec.
> This makes it possible for Merger._maybe_fetch() to fetch the branch
> revisions without specifying a fetch_spec (which doesn't work with
> remote foreign repositories that don't allow direct graph access).
>
> Since the fetch_spec argument was added in 2.4, I don't think there is a
> need to deprecate it first.
> - --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~jelmer/bzr/move-interbranch-fetch2/+merge/54958
> Your team bzr-core is requested to review the proposed merge of
> lp:~jelmer/bzr/move-interbranch-fetch2 into lp:bzr.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk2YkekACgkQJdeBCYSNAAPDPwCdGs5DDx1uCCMyP5UcOGdbdE7W
> wTkAoJukPhEgwObgCNBt3tP5S5vGYIeV
> =rRiH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

« Back to merge proposal