Code review comment for lp:~iffy/storm/lazycolumns

Revision history for this message
Matt Haggard (iffy) wrote :


No, this patch doesn't need to change to support per-query laziness in the future. Per-query laziness would use some of the stuff in this patch as it is. The overlap point is probably the LazyGroupMember class, which would probably be changed to Unloaded, NotLoadedYet, NotFetchedYet or Unfetched or something like that. But that's used internally and not in the public API.

Thanks for your help on this!


« Back to merge proposal