Code review comment for lp:~iffy/storm/lazycolumns

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Matt Haggard <email address hidden> wrote:
> So what's the next step on this?

Well, I think for you to spend a little time coming up with an answer to
'does the patch need to change to gracefully permit per-field laziness
in future'

if the answer is no, then we review and land; if it is yes, you make
such changes as you consider necessary to future proof, then we review
and land.


« Back to merge proposal