Merge lp:~hbrunn/banking-addons/lp-1106831-handle-P into lp:banking-addons/6.1
Proposed by
Holger Brunn (Therp)
Status: | Superseded |
---|---|
Proposed branch: | lp:~hbrunn/banking-addons/lp-1106831-handle-P |
Merge into: | lp:banking-addons/6.1 |
Diff against target: |
14 lines (+2/-2) 1 file modified
account_banking_nl_clieop/wizard/clieop.py (+2/-2) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~hbrunn/banking-addons/lp-1106831-handle-P |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Stefan Rijnhart (Opener) | Needs Information | ||
Review via email:
|
This proposal has been superseded by a proposal from 2013-01-28.
To post a comment you must log in.
Good catch, but did you check whether this makes for a valid Clieop file? The most recent Clieop specifications don't mention it, but the specifications from March 2006 rule it out explicitely in page 15 of
http:// www-old. adslweb. net/tools/ clieop2psv/ ClieOp_ 03_EN.pdf
It may be bank specific as well. Rabobank rules it out in page 12 of
https:/ /www.rabobank. com/en/ images/ Format_ description_ _RCM6.pdf
So does ING in page 10 of
http:// www.ing. nl/Images/ ClieOp_ 03_tcm7- 69019.pdf
All of this seems to indicate that a better approach would be to replace the P by a zero. What do you think?