Merge lp:~gz/bzr-windows-installers/runtime_libraries_in_lib_881203 into lp:bzr-windows-installers
Proposed by
Martin Packman
Status: | Rejected |
---|---|
Rejected by: | Martin Packman |
Proposed branch: | lp:~gz/bzr-windows-installers/runtime_libraries_in_lib_881203 |
Merge into: | lp:bzr-windows-installers |
Diff against target: |
34 lines (+7/-6) 1 file modified
build.py (+7/-6) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~gz/bzr-windows-installers/runtime_libraries_in_lib_881203 |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Martin Packman (community) | Disapprove | ||
Review via email: mp+83854@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
Swap the funny manifest path hack around so the C and C++ runtime libraries get installed to the lib dir rather than the root install dir which may be added to %PATH% and break things.
I can't test that this actually works for machines that need the runtime bundled right now, and am not keen on landing this without knowing it works the same as the previous hack.
To post a comment you must log in.
Unmerged revisions
- 193. By Martin Packman
-
Place the runtime libraries in under lib rather than next to the executables
> I can't test that this actually works for machines that need the runtime bundled right now, and am not keen on landing this without knowing it works the same as the previous hack.
Does testing that require people build a new installer, or just run
the installer?
Either way you are probably better off asking on the list.
I don't think there is much point asking specifically for code review
if you know the results work; this kind of stuff is pretty empirical.