> Hm, I'd prefer if you went with a PQM style thing, where you play the PQM.
> That is, and all changes get done in their own development branches and
> merged, not pushed, to trunk only when in a complete form. That means trunk
> remains stable, and each step is usable (complete with NEWS and tests and so
> on), rather than being done in bits.
Works for me. I have removed the development branch.
> Hm, I'd prefer if you went with a PQM style thing, where you play the PQM.
> That is, and all changes get done in their own development branches and
> merged, not pushed, to trunk only when in a complete form. That means trunk
> remains stable, and each step is usable (complete with NEWS and tests and so
> on), rather than being done in bits.
Works for me. I have removed the development branch.