Thanks for a patch. However, your solution doesn't work for this scenario:
a (due next week) b (due next month) - c (due tomorrow)
After applying your patch I would expect to have [when sorting by due date, close dates first]
b (due next month) -c (due tomorrow) a (due next week)
(b's due date should be replaced by c's tomorrow)
« Back to merge proposal
Thanks for a patch. However, your solution doesn't work for this scenario:
a (due next week)
b (due next month)
- c (due tomorrow)
After applying your patch I would expect to have [when sorting by due date, close dates first]
b (due next month)
-c (due tomorrow)
a (due next week)
(b's due date should be replaced by c's tomorrow)