Merge lp:~gl-az/percona-xtrabackup/2.0-testrun-summary into lp:percona-xtrabackup/2.0
Status: | Superseded |
---|---|
Proposed branch: | lp:~gl-az/percona-xtrabackup/2.0-testrun-summary |
Merge into: | lp:percona-xtrabackup/2.0 |
Diff against target: |
187 lines (+62/-14) 2 files modified
test/testrun.c (+49/-11) test/testrun.sh (+13/-3) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~gl-az/percona-xtrabackup/2.0-testrun-summary |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Laurynas Biveinis (community) | Approve | ||
Registry Administrators | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+167355@code.launchpad.net |
This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2013-06-03.
This proposal has been superseded by a proposal from 2013-06-05.
Description of the change
Added test status tracking and summary report at end of test run cycle to make it wasy to see what failed at a glance, similar to MTR.
</facepalm>
Unmerged revisions
- 561. By George Ormond Lorch III
-
Fixed issue in testrun.c where specifying testsuite would find the tests in the corredt directory but would still try to execute them out of ./t
Added test status tracking and summary report at end of test run cycle to make it wasy to see what passed, skipped and failed at a glance, similar to MTR.
Changed testrun.sh slightly to return same code out of testrun.sh as the test that was executed when only a single test was run.
Doesn't this report the skipped testcases (exit code == 200) as the failed ones?
If yes, that wouldn't be entirely correct, I'd report failed and skipped testcases separately.
Typo on diff line 32.