lp:~gerboland/miral/qt-distinguish-visible-exposure
- Get this branch:
- bzr branch lp:~gerboland/miral/qt-distinguish-visible-exposure
Branch merges
- Daniel d'Andrada (community): Approve
-
Diff: 190 lines (+25/-22)8 files modifiedmiral-qt/demos/qml-demo-shell/windowModel.qml (+1/-0)
miral-qt/src/modules/Unity/Application/mirsurface.cpp (+13/-11)
miral-qt/src/modules/Unity/Application/mirsurface.h (+3/-3)
miral-qt/src/modules/Unity/Application/mirsurfaceinterface.h (+1/-1)
miral-qt/src/modules/Unity/Application/mirsurfaceitem.cpp (+4/-4)
miral-qt/src/modules/Unity/Application/mirsurfaceitem.h (+1/-1)
miral-qt/tests/framework/fake_mirsurface.cpp (+1/-1)
miral-qt/tests/framework/fake_mirsurface.h (+1/-1)
Branch information
Recent revisions
- 348. By Gerry Boland
-
Distinguish visible from exposure: miral defines visible, qml sets the exposure and should respect visible
- 347. By Alan Griffiths
-
BasicWindowMana
ger::modify_ window( ) shouldn't be calling constrain_resize() - that should be a policy decision. - 346. By Daniel d'Andrada
-
WindowInfo: Apply constraints to new_size before using it for anything
So you avoid dealing with an invalid size (with zero or negative dimension)
which causes a crash in aspect ratio code - 345. By Alan Griffiths
-
Spinner code had partial support for non-fullscreen surfaces, make that work and add an accessor for the underlying MirSurface
- 343. By Daniel d'Andrada
-
Fixed qtmir::
MirSurface: :size It's should driven exclusively by the texture size. Having it being set also
by mir:scene:Surface: :size causes conflicts as it won't match the size of the
texture at hand (which is what matters) during resizes. - 340. By Alan Griffiths
-
Test that rules for user positioning of surfaces are applied by WindowManagerTo
ols::drag_ active_ window( )
Branch metadata
- Branch format:
- Branch format 7
- Repository format:
- Bazaar repository format 2a (needs bzr 1.16 or later)
- Stacked on:
- lp:miral