Merge lp:~fgimenez/snappy/udf-revision into lp:~snappy-dev/snappy/snappy-moved-to-github
Proposed by
Federico Gimenez
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Leo Arias |
Approved revision: | 691 |
Merged at revision: | 709 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~fgimenez/snappy/udf-revision |
Merge into: | lp:~snappy-dev/snappy/snappy-moved-to-github |
Diff against target: |
12 lines (+1/-1) 1 file modified
_integration-tests/testutils/image/image.go (+1/-1) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~fgimenez/snappy/udf-revision |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Leo Arias (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+271081@code.launchpad.net |
Commit message
New format for passing the revision parameter in udf
Description of the change
New format for passing the revision parameter in udf
To post a comment you must log in.
why is this needed? I'm testing it with the latest udf and it works without the =.
I'm not opposed to this, it looks fine. just wondering if it's a pure cosmetic thing.