Merge lp:~fgimenez/snappy/udf-revision into lp:~snappy-dev/snappy/snappy-moved-to-github
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Leo Arias on 2015-09-17 |
| Approved revision: | 691 |
| Merged at revision: | 709 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~fgimenez/snappy/udf-revision |
| Merge into: | lp:~snappy-dev/snappy/snappy-moved-to-github |
| Diff against target: |
12 lines (+1/-1) 1 file modified
_integration-tests/testutils/image/image.go (+1/-1) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~fgimenez/snappy/udf-revision |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leo Arias | 2015-09-15 | Approve on 2015-09-17 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
New format for passing the revision parameter in udf
Description of the Change
New format for passing the revision parameter in udf
| Federico Gimenez (fgimenez) wrote : | # |
I'm getting this error when a revision flag is given:
$ go run _integration-
Building tests...
go test -c ./_integration-
Writing test config...
{_integration-
Creating image...
sudo ubuntu-device-flash --verbose --revision -1 core rolling --output /tmp/snappy-
expected argument for flag `--revision', but got option `-1'
Never used this revision flag before :) it'll be useful for sure for automated upgrade tests


why is this needed? I'm testing it with the latest udf and it works without the =.
I'm not opposed to this, it looks fine. just wondering if it's a pure cosmetic thing.