Merge lp:~feng-kylin/unity8/AddTouchStateOnNavigation into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by: | Albert Astals Cid on 2015-07-13 | ||||
| Approved revision: | 1826 | ||||
| Merged at revision: | 1875 | ||||
| Proposed branch: | lp:~feng-kylin/unity8/AddTouchStateOnNavigation | ||||
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 | ||||
| Diff against target: |
107 lines (+6/-49) 1 file modified
qml/Dash/DashNavigationList.qml (+6/-49) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~feng-kylin/unity8/AddTouchStateOnNavigation | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-07-15 | |
| Albert Astals Cid (community) | Abstain on 2015-07-13 | ||
| Mirco Müller (community) | 2015-06-23 | Abstain on 2015-07-13 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Added touch state on navigation.
Description of the Change
Added touch state on navigation.
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected? Please list.
no
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
n/a
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
no
| Mirco Müller (macslow) wrote : | # |
Doh... never mind... just saw the Rectangle with height = units.dp(1) which acts are the divider.
I've still to run and see the change in action. Once that's done I'll approve it as the code looks fine to me.
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1823
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Daniel d'Andrada (dandrader) wrote : | # |
Please add this checklist[1] to the description field of this merge proposal.
[1] - https:/
| Mirco Müller (macslow) wrote : | # |
Have a look at this photo...
* http://
On the left it shows your branch running on a Nexus4, while on the left you see a bq Aquaris E4.5 running stock unity8. Looking at the photo provided by Design with the bug...
* https:/
... the left and right edges look cut off in your version? Is that ok with Design? It feels weird to me. Please check with them and have one of them comment here.
| handsome_feng (feng-kylin) wrote : | # |
> Have a look at this photo...
>
> * http://
>
> On the left it shows your branch running on a Nexus4, while on the left you
> see a bq Aquaris E4.5 running stock unity8. Looking at the photo provided by
> Design with the bug...
>
> * https:/
>
> ... the left and right edges look cut off in your version? Is that ok with
> Design? It feels weird to me. Please check with them and have one of them
> comment here.
I am not sure whether the white space of both edges is needed or not. But since
the photo above is provided by the Designer, I will make it as the given example.
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
Please clean your tags as described in https:/
| handsome_feng (feng-kylin) wrote : | # |
Seems the tags did not pushed to my branch...
sorry, can anyone tell me how to push it after I delete the
spurious tags ? Thank you in advance!
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
Just run
strip-tags.py lp:~feng-kylin/unity8/AddTouchStateOnNavigation
| handsome_feng (feng-kylin) wrote : | # |
> Just run
> strip-tags.py lp:~feng-kylin/unity8/AddTouchStateOnNavigation
Thank you! done.
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
Tags are clean i'll leave the rest to Mirco
| Mirco Müller (macslow) wrote : | # |
Ok, looking good now.
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
Yes, see http://
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
No, because there were unrelated autopilot-failures.
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes, all clean.
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
I'd say the "allButton" also needs a selected.
I.e.
make tryDash
Click on root, rootChild2, allmiddle2
Now open again the departments again by clicking on middle2
Any reason allmiddle2 doesn't have a checkmark?
| handsome_feng (feng-kylin) wrote : | # |
> I'd say the "allButton" also needs a selected.
>
> I.e.
> make tryDash
> Click on root, rootChild2, allmiddle2
> Now open again the departments again by clicking on middle2
> Any reason allmiddle2 doesn't have a checkmark?
I am really not sure about this, I just followed the previously design.
| Mirco Müller (macslow) wrote : | # |
> > I'd say the "allButton" also needs a selected.
> >
> > I.e.
> > make tryDash
> > Click on root, rootChild2, allmiddle2
> > Now open again the departments again by clicking on middle2
> > Any reason allmiddle2 doesn't have a checkmark?
>
> I am really not sure about this, I just followed the previously design.
I tend to agree, since the initial UX-bug https:/
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1826
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://

See inline-comments.