Merge lp:~dshrews/drizzle/bug730936 into lp:drizzle/7.0
Proposed by
David Shrewsbury
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Brian Aker |
Approved revision: | 2222 |
Merged at revision: | 2225 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~dshrews/drizzle/bug730936 |
Merge into: | lp:drizzle/7.0 |
Diff against target: |
102 lines (+42/-3) 4 files modified
plugin/slave/docs/index.rst (+16/-3) plugin/slave/module.cc (+5/-0) plugin/slave/queue_producer.h (+5/-0) plugin/slave/replication_slave.h (+16/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~dshrews/drizzle/bug730936 |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Drizzle Developers | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+52479@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
A new option to help provision a new slave. Lets us tell the slave where to begin reading the master's transaction log (i.e., use the value output from: drizzledump --single-
To post a comment you must log in.
a nitpick but this confused me a little.
The usage for this is a little confusing given the column names ID, and COMMIT_ID in the sys_replication_log and what is written when using drizzledump.
--slave. max-commit- id arg Value to use as the
maximum commit ID stored
on the slave
I think it would be more clear if "commit ID" was changed to "COMMIT_ID"