Code review comment for lp:~doxxx/bzr/quiet-serve

Revision history for this message
Gordon Tyler (doxxx) wrote :

> So, you cargo culted, which is fine :). However this test doesn't need a
> subprocess. The other ones did for a few reasons, but I don't see why
> this one would.

Can you explain to me why this test doesn't require one? I cannot see a difference between this and the other tests. If the test invokes 'bzr serve' in-process it will block and the tests will hang.

« Back to merge proposal