Merge lp:~doanac/utah/pluggable-battery into lp:utah
Proposed by
Andy Doan
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Javier Collado |
Approved revision: | 866 |
Merged at revision: | 868 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~doanac/utah/pluggable-battery |
Merge into: | lp:utah |
Diff against target: |
174 lines (+110/-5) 3 files modified
client.py (+10/-0) utah/client/battery.py (+46/-5) utah/client/tests/test_battery.py (+54/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~doanac/utah/pluggable-battery |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Javier Collado (community) | Approve | ||
Andy Doan (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email:
|
Description of the change
kind of went on a detour today. the "puts" system is going to be deployed in the lab pretty soon and will cause us to need to support multiple battery implementations in the UTAH client.
I'm not a huge fan of this approach, but we aren't using pkg_resources anywhere else in our code, so thought this might suffice.
To post a comment you must log in.
This looks reasonable to me, but I don't have a good way to test it.