Merge lp:~dandrader/unity8/controlTouchEmulationFromQML into lp:unity8

Proposed by Daniel d'Andrada
Status: Merged
Approved by: Michael Zanetti
Approved revision: 1640
Merged at revision: 1668
Proposed branch: lp:~dandrader/unity8/controlTouchEmulationFromQML
Merge into: lp:unity8
Prerequisite: lp:~dandrader/unity8/unifyShellTests
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp:~dandrader/unity8/controlTouchEmulationFromQML
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Michael Zanetti (community) Approve
PS Jenkins bot continuous-integration Pending
Review via email: mp+252489@code.launchpad.net

This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2015-03-02.

Commit message

Make MouseTouchAdaptor controllable from within QML

Description of the change

* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected? Please list.
No, but for better effect try this branch along with lp:~mzanetti/unity8/indicators-mouse and run "make tryPanel"

* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes.

* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes.

* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
Not applicable.

* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
Not applicable.

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
review: Needs Fixing (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
review: Needs Fixing (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Functionality seems to work fine. Code-wise I'm ok too.

Does fail some tests in jenkins though.

review: Needs Fixing
Revision history for this message
Daniel d'Andrada (dandrader) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

> Functionality seems to work fine. Code-wise I'm ok too.
>
> Does fail some tests in jenkins though.

Those are old failures that should be fixed by now. I should probably resubmit to get a new jenkins run because I did "push --overwrite". :/

Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
review: Needs Fixing (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

 * Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?

yes

 * Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.

AP failures don't look related...

 * Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?

yes

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
review: Needs Fixing (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
Michał Sawicz (saviq) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Please have a look at https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-020-1-build/89/console and see what can you rebase on to get rid of the conflict.

Revision history for this message
Daniel d'Andrada (dandrader) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

On 10/03/15 12:03, Michał Sawicz wrote:
> Please have a look at https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-020-1-build/89/console and see what can you rebase on to get rid of the conflict.

Done.

Revision history for this message
Daniel d'Andrada (dandrader) wrote :

It displays no diff but if you merge it locally you will see it. Lanchpad had an internal error when producing the diff. :-/

Revision history for this message
Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) :
review: Approve

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches