Merge lp:~corey.bryant/openstack-charm-testing/add-new-svcs-to-sparse into lp:openstack-charm-testing
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Ryan Beisner on 2017-02-01 |
| Approved revision: | 263 |
| Merged at revision: | 265 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~corey.bryant/openstack-charm-testing/add-new-svcs-to-sparse |
| Merge into: | lp:openstack-charm-testing |
| Diff against target: |
214 lines (+115/-10) 2 files modified
bundles/sparse/default.yaml (+73/-3) bundles/sparse/next.yaml (+42/-7) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~corey.bryant/openstack-charm-testing/add-new-svcs-to-sparse |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Beisner | 2016-12-13 | Needs Information on 2017-01-10 | |
| OpenStack Charm Testing Maintainers | 2016-12-13 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Add aodh, barbican, and designate to sparse default/next bundles.
| Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote : | # |
aodh and designate do have trusty charm versions. I started working on these updates, but I'm not sure if it's worth adding them to the bundle for trusty, since the charm/packages were new in yakkety.
| Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote : | # |
clarification: the charms were new in yakkety
| Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) wrote : | # |
If the charms support Trusty (and some do), we need the bundles to define those targets imho. Otherwise we're releasing charm to a series that isn't tested.
If the practicality measure says why-bother @ trusty on those new charms, then we should confer, discuss and decide to remove that series from the charm metadata - and if so, then my reservations here evaporate. :-)
| James Page (james-page) wrote : | # |
I think we agreed that trusty-mitaka would be support for deployment on
trusty as that's the last series supported for 14.04.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 at 18:02, Ryan Beisner <email address hidden>
wrote:
> Review: Needs Information
>
> If the charms support Trusty (and some do), we need the bundles to define
> those targets imho. Otherwise we're releasing charm to a series that isn't
> tested.
>
> If the practicality measure says why-bother @ trusty on those new charms,
> then we should confer, discuss and decide to remove that series from the
> charm metadata - and if so, then my reservations here evaporate. :-)
> --
>
> https:/
> Your team OpenStack Charmers is subscribed to branch
> lp:openstack-charm-testing.
>
- 263. By Corey Bryant on 2017-02-01
-
Enable aodh and designate for trusty-mitaka
| Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote : | # |
Ok finally got back to this! aodh and designate are now deployed if trusty-mitaka or greater is chosen. And if xenial or greater is chosen barbican is added to the deployment.
I'm pretty sure one or more of these have Trusty support. Can you check into that before we proceed? Thanks!