Merge lp:~cimi/unity8/fix-1363400 into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Albert Astals Cid on 2015-02-04 |
| Approved revision: | 1567 |
| Merged at revision: | 1589 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~cimi/unity8/fix-1363400 |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
94 lines (+29/-9) 2 files modified
debian/control (+2/-0) qml/Wizard/Pages/40-wifi.qml (+27/-9) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~cimi/unity8/fix-1363400 |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Astals Cid (community) | 2015-01-21 | Approve on 2015-02-04 | |
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-02-03 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Fix continue button in wifi wizard page, adds qml-module-
Description of the Change
The RTM part of this lives at https:/
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected? Please list.
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Sure
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
I will
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
n/a
- 1562. By Andrea Cimitan on 2015-01-21
-
minor
- 1563. By Andrea Cimitan on 2015-01-21
-
This proved to be more reliable on krillin
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1563
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
I'm a bit confused by how the code has
property string accessPointName: getAccessPointN
but then in the getAccessPointName function you do accessPointName = "" which basically breaks the above binding and the you also have
onNetworkNameC
and
onNetworkStatu
which seems like they are trying to make up for the broken binding.
Wouldn't it be better to just have the getAccessPointN
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
Ok, ignore my comment since
networkStatu
actually needs to be a function call so we need the onChanged stuff.
This NetworkInfo for QML seems like it's not very QML-friednly to be honest :/
- 1564. By Andrea Cimitan on 2015-01-22
-
fix for jenkins
- 1565. By Andrea Cimitan on 2015-01-22
-
let's add also for runtime
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1565
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
- 1566. By Andrea Cimitan on 2015-01-23
-
Some testers reported currentNetworkMode being sometimes set after the networkName changes (on RTM), let's add a signal, won't hurt
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1566
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1566
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
- 1567. By Andrea Cimitan on 2015-02-03
-
As review
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1567
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
Yes, also the system settings guys approved and landed the counterpart to this
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
Not much, our CI is kind of broken, but we don't have tests over this as far as i can see
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes

FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1562 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- ci/5164/ jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- vivid-touch/ 900 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-phablet- qmluitests- vivid/328 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-amd64- ci/329 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-i386- ci/329 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- runner- vivid-mako/ 791 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 898 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 898/artifact/ work/output/ *zip*/output. zip s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/touch- flash-device/ 17282
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild: s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/unity8- ci/5164/ rebuild
http://