Merge lp:~christophe-lyon/gcc-linaro/backport_bswap16 into lp:gcc-linaro/4.7
- backport_bswap16
- Merge into 4.7
Status: | Superseded |
---|---|
Proposed branch: | lp:~christophe-lyon/gcc-linaro/backport_bswap16 |
Merge into: | lp:gcc-linaro/4.7 |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~christophe-lyon/gcc-linaro/backport_bswap16 |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Michael Hope | Needs Fixing | ||
Review via email:
|
This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2012-12-05.
This proposal has been superseded by a proposal from 2012-12-14.
Commit message
Description of the change
I had forgotten to remove the 2nd offending test....
Now I am trying to replace armv6 by armv7 in the test instead of removing it.
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
+FAIL: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-precise-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-PASS: gcc.target/
+FAIL: gcc.target/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: i686-precise-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r115043 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r115035 is available at:
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
a9-builder a9hf-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64 xaarch64 xaarch64_bare xcortexa15hf
You can track the build queue at:
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr115035
cbuild-state: check
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-FAIL: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-precise-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-PASS: gcc.target/
+FAIL: gcc.target/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: i686-precise-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: armv7l-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-FAIL: gcc.dg/
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: armv7l-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
+ERROR: gcc.target/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: armv7l-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
Why have these tests changed. They seem unrelated:
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
The target selector is missing:
+ERROR: gcc.target/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-precise-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
+PASS: gcc.target/
-PASS: gcc.target/
+FAIL: gcc.target/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: i686-precise-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) wrote : | # |
I have backported one generic patch which does change the tests you have noticed.
I have fixed the target selector (should have been v7a instead of v7).
Michael has fixed a cbuild script, so the regression on i686 should disappear.
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r115040 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r115035 is available at: builds. linaro. org/toolchain/ snapshots/ gcc-linaro- 4.7+bzr115040~ christophe- lyon~backport_ bswap16. diff
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
a9-builder a9hf-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64 xaarch64 xaarch64_bare xcortexa15hf
You can track the build queue at: ex.seabright. co.nz/helpers/ scheduler
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro- 4.7+bzr115040~ christophe- lyon~backport_ bswap16
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr115035
cbuild-state: check