Merge lp:~christian-roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl

Proposed by Christian Röller
Status: Superseded
Proposed branch: lp:~christian-roeller/hipl/whitelisting
Merge into: lp:hipl
Diff against target: 177 lines (+73/-20)
2 files modified
hipd/netdev.c (+71/-20)
hipd/netdev.h (+2/-0)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp:~christian-roeller/hipl/whitelisting
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Stefan Götz (community) Approve
Diego Biurrun Needs Fixing
Review via email: mp+71064@code.launchpad.net

This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2011-07-14.

This proposal has been superseded by a proposal from 2011-08-11.

Description of the change

Change in the whitelisting of hipl:

The problem with the current whitelisting fuction is, that it only considers the interface-indexes. So when you for instance want to whitelist your eth0 interface, but there are also alias-interfaces for this interface on your machine, then a change for this alias-interfaces would also trigger an update, because these interfaces have the same interface-index for the kernel.

To have a more concrete possibility to whitelist interfaces, I extend the whitelist-structure with the interface-label. So that when you now whitelist your interface eth0, only changes on this interface would trigger an update and not for the alias-interfaces.

I did this by just checking for every incoming NEWADDR netlinkevent, if the corresponding label for this address is whitelisted or not.

So please have a look and just tell if you are fine with this...

To post a comment you must log in.
Stefan Götz (stefan.goetz-deactivatedaccount) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
Download full text (7.4 KiB)

Hi Christian!

Thanks for this helpful contribution! My comments below:

> > === modified file 'hipd/netdev.c'
> > --- hipd/netdev.c 2011-05-31 18:21:28 +0000
> > +++ hipd/netdev.c 2011-07-14 15:34:41 +0000
> > -static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index(int if_index)
> > +static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index_and_name(int if_index, const char *const device_name)

[L] cleanup: please add a 'const' modifier to the 'if_index' argument
[L] cleanup: I guess that 'if_index' cannot be less than 0. If so, it would be
nice to change its type to unsigned to communicate this fact to the caller.

> > {
> > if (hip_netdev_white_list_count < HIP_NETDEV_MAX_WHITE_LIST) {
> > - hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count++] = if_index;
> > + hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count].if_index = if_index;
> > + strncpy(hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count].if_label, device_name, IF_NAMESIZE);
[L] maintainability: it is more maintainable to use
'sizeof(hip_netdev_white_list[0].if_label)' than 'IF_NAMESIZE' because then the
size of the 'if_label' field can be changed in the struct declaration without
having to touch other code.

> > @@ -120,16 +127,18 @@
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * Test if the given network interface index is white listed.
> > + * Test if the given network interface index plus label is white listed.
> > *
> > * @param if_index the index of the network interface to be tested
> > + * @param device_name the label of the network interface to be tested
> > * @return 1 if the index is whitelisted or zero otherwise
> > */
> > -static int hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(int if_index)
> > +static int hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(int if_index, char *device_name)

[M] policy: please apply full const correctness to the function arguments.
[L] cleanup: it would be nice to change the type of 'if_index' to unsigned as it
can never be < 0 (I guess)

> > {
> > - int i = 0;
> > + int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < hip_netdev_white_list_count; i++) {

[L] style: you could even place the declaration of 'i' in the for() header.

> > - if (hip_netdev_white_list[i] == if_index) {
> > + if (hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_index == if_index &&
> > + !strncmp(hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_label, device_name, IF_NAMESIZE)) {

[L] maintainability: 'sizeof()' instead of 'IF_NAMESIZE', see above

> > @@ -637,7 +645,7 @@
> > HIP_IFEL(!(if_index = if_nametoindex(g_iface->ifa_name)),
> > -1, "if_nametoindex failed\n");
> > /* Check if our interface is in the whitelist */
> > - if ((hip_netdev_white_list_count > 0) && (!hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(if_index))) {
> > + if ((hip_netdev_white_list_count > 0) && (!hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(if_index, g_iface->ifa_name))) {

[L] style: just a general comment: it would make more sense to move the '> 0'
check into the 'hip_netdev_is_in_white_list()' function so the caller does not
need to have internal knowledge about the list implementation. Furthermore it's
a really silly performance optimization.

> > @@ -1125,6 +1133,55 @@
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + * find interface label for a given ip4 or ip6 addr
...

Read more...

review: Needs Fixing
Miika Komu (miika-iki) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Quick test report: seems to work without any troubles.

Christian Röller (christian-roeller) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
Download full text (9.2 KiB)

Once my exam is over I have finally found the time to work on your improvement suggestions...

> Hi Christian!
>
> Thanks for this helpful contribution! My comments below:
>
> > > === modified file 'hipd/netdev.c'
> > > --- hipd/netdev.c 2011-05-31 18:21:28 +0000
> > > +++ hipd/netdev.c 2011-07-14 15:34:41 +0000
> > > -static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index(int if_index)
> > > +static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index_and_name(int if_index, const
> char *const device_name)
>
> [L] cleanup: please add a 'const' modifier to the 'if_index' argument
> [L] cleanup: I guess that 'if_index' cannot be less than 0. If so, it would be
> nice to change its type to unsigned to communicate this fact to the caller.

Both done, you are right no reason here for dont make it unsigned and const...

>
> > > {
> > > if (hip_netdev_white_list_count < HIP_NETDEV_MAX_WHITE_LIST) {
> > > - hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count++] = if_index;
> > > + hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count].if_index =
> if_index;
> > > +
> strncpy(hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count].if_label,
> device_name, IF_NAMESIZE);
> [L] maintainability: it is more maintainable to use
> 'sizeof(hip_netdev_white_list[0].if_label)' than 'IF_NAMESIZE' because then
> the
> size of the 'if_label' field can be changed in the struct declaration without
> having to touch other code.

Good point I didnt take this into account, its changed now

>
> > > @@ -120,16 +127,18 @@
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > - * Test if the given network interface index is white listed.
> > > + * Test if the given network interface index plus label is white listed.
> > > *
> > > * @param if_index the index of the network interface to be tested
> > > + * @param device_name the label of the network interface to be tested
> > > * @return 1 if the index is whitelisted or zero otherwise
> > > */
> > > -static int hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(int if_index)
> > > +static int hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(int if_index, char *device_name)
>
> [M] policy: please apply full const correctness to the function arguments.
> [L] cleanup: it would be nice to change the type of 'if_index' to unsigned as
> it
> can never be < 0 (I guess)

Same as above, so done...

>
> > > {
> > > - int i = 0;
> > > + int i;
> > > for (i = 0; i < hip_netdev_white_list_count; i++) {
>
> [L] style: you could even place the declaration of 'i' in the for() header.

Yes I can, so I did... ;-) The actual writer did it like this, so I just adopt it...

>
> > > - if (hip_netdev_white_list[i] == if_index) {
> > > + if (hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_index == if_index &&
> > > + !strncmp(hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_label, device_name,
> IF_NAMESIZE)) {
>
> [L] maintainability: 'sizeof()' instead of 'IF_NAMESIZE', see above

Done...but I use sizeof()-1 to do not override the null-termination

>
> > > @@ -637,7 +645,7 @@
> > > HIP_IFEL(!(if_index = if_nametoindex(g_iface->ifa_name)),
> > > -1, "if_nametoindex failed\n");
> > > /* Check if our interface is in the whitelist */
> > > - if ((hip_netdev_white_list_count ...

Read more...

Stefan Götz (stefan.goetz-deactivatedaccount) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
Download full text (4.4 KiB)

Hi Christian!

Thanks for your detailed reply! I was on holidays so that's why my answer is
quite late:

>>>> - if (hip_netdev_white_list[i] == if_index) {
>>>> + if (hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_index == if_index &&
>>>> + !strncmp(hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_label, device_name,
>> IF_NAMESIZE)) {
>>
>> [L] maintainability: 'sizeof()' instead of 'IF_NAMESIZE', see above
>
> Done...but I use sizeof()-1 to do not override the null-termination

Hm - in the case of the read-only 'strncmp()' function, I'm pretty sure that you
want to check both strings to their full extent, including the null-terminating
character. Otherwise, you can get false positives with unterminated strings (I
know, that's a pathological case, but still, passing 'sizeof() - 1' to
'strncmp()' seems logically incorrect to me).

>>>> +int hip_find_label_for_address(struct sockaddr *addr, char *label)
>>
>> [M] policy: please ensure full const correctness
>
> I write to label and cast addr, so I cannot declare const, can I?

You can use 'const struct sockaddr *const addr' and cast it to 'const struct
sockaddr_in const* s4_in'. Similarly, you can use 'char *const label' as you do
not intend to or do change the pointer value.

>>>> + res = getifaddrs(&myaddrs);
>>>> + for (ifa = myaddrs; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
>>>> + if (ifa->ifa_addr == NULL) continue;
>>>> + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET &&
>> ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET6) continue;
>>
>> [M] policy: HIPL always uses "long" if statements including braces and
>> newlines.
>> Please adhere to that style. Do you use the pre-commit hook for checking your
>> code style? I'm asking because I'm surprised that the checker does not catch
>> this.
>
> For me the statement doesnt include braces or a new line. Maybe I have changed it and forgot to commit it...maybe you can check it again...

Exactly my point: it *should* include braces and newlines but currently it does
not :-) It should read

if (ifa->ifa_addr == NULL) {
 continue;
}

etc.

>> [L] maintainability: similar to the above cases, 'sizeof(s4_in)' would be more
>> easily maintainable and more obvious to read than 'sizeof(struct
>> sockaddr_in)'.
>> The same applies to the code below.
>>
>>>> + strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, IF_NAMESIZE);
>>
>> [L] 'sizeof()'
>
> Both done, like described above...

Just like 'strncmp()', 'strncpy()' should use the full character array - the
code should also check that the string to copy is not longer than the given
character array - 1 or otherwise return an error from the function. Only this
combination will ensure that the string is either copied correctly or an error
is detected under all circumstances.

>>>> + freeifaddrs(myaddrs);
>>>> + return 1;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family == AF_INET6) {
>>>> + s6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)(ifa->ifa_addr);
>>>> + if (!memcmp(s6_in, s6, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6))) {
>>>> + strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, IF_NAMESIZE);
>>>> + freeifaddrs(myaddrs);
>>>> + return 1;
>>
>> [L] styl...

Read more...

Christian Röller (christian-roeller) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
Download full text (5.1 KiB)

> Hi Christian!
>
> Thanks for your detailed reply! I was on holidays so that's why my answer is
> quite late:

No problem my first reply has also taken a while due to my exam preparations ;-)

>
> >>>> - if (hip_netdev_white_list[i] == if_index) {
> >>>> + if (hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_index == if_index &&
> >>>> + !strncmp(hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_label, device_name,
> >> IF_NAMESIZE)) {
> >>
> >> [L] maintainability: 'sizeof()' instead of 'IF_NAMESIZE', see above
> >
> > Done...but I use sizeof()-1 to do not override the null-termination
>
> Hm - in the case of the read-only 'strncmp()' function, I'm pretty sure that
> you
> want to check both strings to their full extent, including the null-
> terminating
> character. Otherwise, you can get false positives with unterminated strings (I
> know, that's a pathological case, but still, passing 'sizeof() - 1' to
> 'strncmp()' seems logically incorrect to me).

Yes of course...I never did it in the code. This was just a comment at the wrong position.

>
> >>>> +int hip_find_label_for_address(struct sockaddr *addr, char *label)
> >>
> >> [M] policy: please ensure full const correctness
> >
> > I write to label and cast addr, so I cannot declare const, can I?
>
> You can use 'const struct sockaddr *const addr' and cast it to 'const struct
> sockaddr_in const* s4_in'. Similarly, you can use 'char *const label' as you
> do
> not intend to or do change the pointer value.

Yes you are right, did it.

>
> >>>> + res = getifaddrs(&myaddrs);
> >>>> + for (ifa = myaddrs; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
> >>>> + if (ifa->ifa_addr == NULL) continue;
> >>>> + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET &&
> >> ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET6) continue;
> >>
> >> [M] policy: HIPL always uses "long" if statements including braces and
> >> newlines.
> >> Please adhere to that style. Do you use the pre-commit hook for checking
> your
> >> code style? I'm asking because I'm surprised that the checker does not
> catch
> >> this.
> >
> > For me the statement doesnt include braces or a new line. Maybe I have
> changed it and forgot to commit it...maybe you can check it again...
>
> Exactly my point: it *should* include braces and newlines but currently it
> does
> not :-) It should read
>
> if (ifa->ifa_addr == NULL) {
> continue;
> }
>
> etc.

Ah OK now I got your point...sorry ;-) I changed it

>
> >> [L] maintainability: similar to the above cases, 'sizeof(s4_in)' would be
> more
> >> easily maintainable and more obvious to read than 'sizeof(struct
> >> sockaddr_in)'.
> >> The same applies to the code below.
> >>
> >>>> + strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, IF_NAMESIZE);
> >>
> >> [L] 'sizeof()'
> >
> > Both done, like described above...
>
> Just like 'strncmp()', 'strncpy()' should use the full character array - the
> code should also check that the string to copy is not longer than the given
> character array - 1 or otherwise return an error from the function. Only this
> combination will ensure that the string is either copied correctly or an error
> is detected under all circumstances.

OK, I changed it in the following way:
I chec...

Read more...

Stefan Götz (stefan.goetz-deactivatedaccount) : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
review: Approve
Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

 review needs-fixing

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:34:45PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.

Formatting is messed-up. Didn't you install the uncrustify pre-commit
hook as described in doc/HACKING? Why?

Diego

review: Needs Fixing
Christian Röller (christian-roeller) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

> review needs-fixing
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:34:45PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-
> roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.
>
> Formatting is messed-up. Didn't you install the uncrustify pre-commit
> hook as described in doc/HACKING? Why?
>
> Diego

Sorry for that, I checked now my modifications with the stylechecker and correct everything it complained about.

Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:19:26AM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:34:45PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > > Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-
> > roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.
> >
> > Formatting is messed-up. Didn't you install the uncrustify pre-commit
> > hook as described in doc/HACKING? Why?
>
> Sorry for that, I checked now my modifications with the stylechecker
> and correct everything it complained about.

I'm not trying to pass blame around. I want to know why some of our
processes are not working as intended, so that we can fix them.

Why were you not running uncrustify? Did you just forget to install
the hook (no big deal, we all make mistakes and we have review for a
reason) or did you not know about it? Where would we have to advertise
it so that the next newcomer is informed of its existence?

Diego

Christian Röller (christian-roeller) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:19:26AM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:34:45PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > > > Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-
> > > roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.
> > >
> > > Formatting is messed-up. Didn't you install the uncrustify pre-commit
> > > hook as described in doc/HACKING? Why?
> >
> > Sorry for that, I checked now my modifications with the stylechecker
> > and correct everything it complained about.
>
> I'm not trying to pass blame around. I want to know why some of our
> processes are not working as intended, so that we can fix them.
>
> Why were you not running uncrustify? Did you just forget to install
> the hook (no big deal, we all make mistakes and we have review for a
> reason) or did you not know about it? Where would we have to advertise
> it so that the next newcomer is informed of its existence?
>
> Diego

I have heard that there is a hook for this, but as this is my first share,
I just forgot to install it.
So in this case it was just my fault...
But for the next newcomers, it would be nice to advertise the HACKING doc a
little bit more, because it is very helpful and I don't know about it. I just
heard about the stylechecker through the grapevine.

So sorry again and thanks for the infos...
Christian

Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:59:28AM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:19:26AM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:34:45PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > > > > Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-
> > > > roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.
> > > >
> > > > Formatting is messed-up. Didn't you install the uncrustify pre-commit
> > > > hook as described in doc/HACKING? Why?
> > >
> > > Sorry for that, I checked now my modifications with the stylechecker
> > > and correct everything it complained about.
> >
> > I'm not trying to pass blame around. I want to know why some of our
> > processes are not working as intended, so that we can fix them.
> >
> > Why were you not running uncrustify? Did you just forget to install
> > the hook (no big deal, we all make mistakes and we have review for a
> > reason) or did you not know about it? Where would we have to advertise
> > it so that the next newcomer is informed of its existence?
>
> I have heard that there is a hook for this, but as this is my first share,
> I just forgot to install it.
> So in this case it was just my fault...

I repeat: I'm not trying to pass blame around. Stop apologizing please.

> But for the next newcomers, it would be nice to advertise the HACKING doc a
> little bit more, because it is very helpful and I don't know about it. I just
> heard about the stylechecker through the grapevine.

I've updated INSTALL and the PISA wiki slightly. There's still room for
improvement though.

Diego

Christian Röller (christian-roeller) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Hi,

sorry for my long absence, it was again exam-time ;-)

So I correct everything, which were mentioned. Are there more improvement suggestions or any other reasons why it should not be merged in this version?
Otherwise I would do so.
I merged it locally and as there are only a few changes in two files, it works without any trouble.
The same applies for the compiling.

Regards,
Christian

René Hummen (rene-hummen) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Diego, have your comments been tackled? If so, please approve the merge request.

Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:07:38PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
>
> So I correct everything, which were mentioned. Are there more
> improvement suggestions or any other reasons why it should not be
> merged in this version?
> Otherwise I would do so.

The general idea is that you resubmit a fixed merge proposal.

Diego

Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:39:35PM +0000, René Hummen wrote:
> Diego, have your comments been tackled? If so, please approve the merge request.

There was no updated merge request, so the answer is no.

Diego

Christian Röller (christian-roeller) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:39:35PM +0000, René Hummen wrote:
> > Diego, have your comments been tackled? If so, please approve the merge
> request.
>
> There was no updated merge request, so the answer is no.
>
> Diego

I correct the code style violations with revision 5987.
What do you mean with updated merge request? I answered on your needs-fixing comment and correct it.
I did the same for Stefan's needs-fixing request and he approved it.
What should I rather have done?

Christian

René Hummen (rene-hummen) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

On 10.08.2011, at 17:11, Christian Röller wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:39:35PM +0000, René Hummen wrote:
>>> Diego, have your comments been tackled? If so, please approve the merge
>> request.
>>
>> There was no updated merge request, so the answer is no.
>>
>> Diego
>
> I correct the code style violations with revision 5987.
> What do you mean with updated merge request? I answered on your needs-fixing comment and correct it.
> I did the same for Stefan's needs-fixing request and he approved it.
> What should I rather have done?

In the top right corner of your merge proposal page on the Launchpad website, you can follow the link "Resubmit proposal". Don't check the option to "start afresh" in order to keep the discussion history intact and for others to follow the whole conversation.

Ciao,
René

--
Dipl.-Inform. Rene Hummen, Ph.D. Student
Chair of Communication and Distributed Systems
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
tel: +49 241 80 20772
web: http://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/team/rene-hummen/

Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:11:23PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:39:35PM +0000, René Hummen wrote:
> > > Diego, have your comments been tackled? If so, please approve the merge
> > request.
> >
> > There was no updated merge request, so the answer is no.
>
> I correct the code style violations with revision 5987.
> What do you mean with updated merge request? I answered on your
> needs-fixing comment and correct it.
> I did the same for Stefan's needs-fixing request and he approved it.
> What should I rather have done?

Maybe you did fix it in your branch, but how would we know? We never
had a chance to see and review it. What you should do now is send
another merge request from your updated branch.

Diego

Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote :

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:28:27PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.

Did you run

  make alltests
  tools/hipl_autobuild.sh

with this branch?

> --- hipd/netdev.c 2011-05-25 09:22:19 +0000
> +++ hipd/netdev.c 2011-08-10 15:28:20 +0000
> @@ -99,19 +99,26 @@
> -static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index(int if_index)
> +static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index_and_name(const unsigned int if_index, const char *const device_name)

Please keep lines below 80 characters where easily possible, like here.

More examples below...

> @@ -1122,6 +1131,68 @@
>
> /**
> + * This functions gives you the interface label for a given ip4 or ip6 addr.

IPv4, IPv6 address

> + * @param addr address for which you want to know the label
> + * @param label pointer where the function stores the label
> + * @return one on success, zero on error and write the label in param label

Is the label written in both cases?

> +int hip_find_label_for_address(const struct sockaddr *const addr, char *const label)
> +{
> +
> + if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET) {
> + s4_in = (const struct sockaddr_in *const) (addr);
> + }
> + if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET6) {
> + s6_in = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *const) (addr);
> + }

An else will save you a comparison here.

> + getifaddrs(&myaddrs);
> + for (ifa = myaddrs; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
> + if (ifa->ifa_addr == NULL) {
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET && ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET6) {
> + continue;
> + }

These two could be merged.

> + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family == AF_INET) {
> + s4 = (struct sockaddr_in *) (ifa->ifa_addr);

pointless ()

> + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family == AF_INET6) {
> + s6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) (ifa->ifa_addr);

pointless ()

As above, if you use else here, you could save a comparison.

> + if (!memcmp(s4_in, s4, sizeof(s4))) {
> + if (strlen(ifa->ifa_name) <= sizeof(label) - 1) {
> + strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, sizeof(label) - 1);
> + res = 1;
> + } else {
> + res = 0;
> + }
> + break;

> + if (!memcmp(s6_in, s6, sizeof(s6))) {
> + if (strlen(ifa->ifa_name) <= sizeof(label) - 1) {
> + strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, sizeof(label) - 1);
> + res = 1;
> + } else {
> + res = 0;
> + }
> + break;

Isn't there a way to avoid this code duplication?

Diego

review: Needs Fixing

Fixing Diego's comments sure won't hurt, but otherwise I'm okay with this.

review: Approve
5988. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-11

cosmetic: shorten the hip_find_label_for_address function a little bit

5989. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-11

change the return description for the hip_find_label_for_address function

Download full text (3.3 KiB)

> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:28:27PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-
> roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.
>
> Did you run
>
> make alltests
> tools/hipl_autobuild.sh

Yes I run make alltests. It seems to be OK, I get no errors and it results with "archives ready for distribution".
I am not really sure how to use the autobuild script. How and from which machine can I run this script manually to build my branch?
Can it come to problems, although make and make alltests run without ones?

>
> with this branch?
>
> > --- hipd/netdev.c 2011-05-25 09:22:19 +0000
> > +++ hipd/netdev.c 2011-08-10 15:28:20 +0000
> > @@ -99,19 +99,26 @@
> > -static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index(int if_index)
> > +static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index_and_name(const unsigned int
> if_index, const char *const device_name)
>
> Please keep lines below 80 characters where easily possible, like here.

Done...

>
> More examples below...
>
> > @@ -1122,6 +1131,68 @@
> >
> > /**
> > + * This functions gives you the interface label for a given ip4 or ip6
> addr.
>
> IPv4, IPv6 address

Done...

>
> > + * @param addr address for which you want to know the label
> > + * @param label pointer where the function stores the label
> > + * @return one on success, zero on error and write the label in param label
>
> Is the label written in both cases?

Done...only if the address exists in the system

>
> > +int hip_find_label_for_address(const struct sockaddr *const addr, char
> *const label)
> > +{
> > +
> > + if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET) {
> > + s4_in = (const struct sockaddr_in *const) (addr);
> > + }
> > + if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET6) {
> > + s6_in = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *const) (addr);
> > + }
>
> An else will save you a comparison here.
>
> > + getifaddrs(&myaddrs);
> > + for (ifa = myaddrs; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
> > + if (ifa->ifa_addr == NULL) {
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET && ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family
> != AF_INET6) {
> > + continue;
> > + }
>
> These two could be merged.
>
> > + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family == AF_INET) {
> > + s4 = (struct sockaddr_in *) (ifa->ifa_addr);
>
> pointless ()
>
> > + if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family == AF_INET6) {
> > + s6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) (ifa->ifa_addr);
>
> pointless ()
>
> As above, if you use else here, you could save a comparison.
>
> > + if (!memcmp(s4_in, s4, sizeof(s4))) {
> > + if (strlen(ifa->ifa_name) <= sizeof(label) - 1) {
> > + strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, sizeof(label) - 1);
> > + res = 1;
> > + } else {
> > + res = 0;
> > + }
> > + break;
>
> > + if (!memcmp(s6_in, s6, sizeof(s6))) {
> > + if (strlen(ifa->ifa_name) <= sizeof(label) - 1) {
> > + strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, sizeof(label) - 1);
> > + res = 1;
> > + } else {
> > + ...

Read more...

Diego Biurrun (diego-biurrun) wrote :

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:47:26AM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:28:27PM +0000, Christian Röller wrote:
> > > Christian Röller has proposed merging lp:~christian-
> > roeller/hipl/whitelisting into lp:hipl.
> >
> > Did you run
> >
> > make alltests
> > tools/hipl_autobuild.sh
>
> Yes I run make alltests. It seems to be OK, I get no errors and it
> results with "archives ready for distribution". I am not really sure
> how to use the autobuild script. How and from which machine can I run
> this script manually to build my branch?

Did you try running or reading the script?

> Can it come to problems, although make and make alltests run without ones?

Yes.

Diego

5990. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-12

cosmetic: shorten a few things

5991. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-12

cosmetic: typo in function description

5992. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-22

cosmetic: correct some typos

5993. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-23

cosmetic: alignments in function description hip_find_label_for_address

5994. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-24

Increase the n by 1 in strncpy regarding the writing of the interfacelabel to guarantee null-termination.

5995. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-30

Add Unit-Tests for the new function hip_find_label_for_address in /hipd/netdev.c

5996. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-13

Rebase with trunk.

5997. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-13

A few cosmetic changes and correct one mistake regarding the use of sizeof.

5998. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-14

Cosmetic issues in both files.

5999. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-14

Cosmetic issues in all files.

Unmerged revisions

5999. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-14

Cosmetic issues in all files.

5998. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-14

Cosmetic issues in both files.

5997. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-13

A few cosmetic changes and correct one mistake regarding the use of sizeof.

5996. By Christian Röller on 2011-09-13

Rebase with trunk.

5995. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-30

Add Unit-Tests for the new function hip_find_label_for_address in /hipd/netdev.c

5994. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-24

Increase the n by 1 in strncpy regarding the writing of the interfacelabel to guarantee null-termination.

5993. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-23

cosmetic: alignments in function description hip_find_label_for_address

5992. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-22

cosmetic: correct some typos

5991. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-12

cosmetic: typo in function description

5990. By Christian Röller on 2011-08-12

cosmetic: shorten a few things

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
=== modified file 'hipd/netdev.c'
--- hipd/netdev.c 2011-05-25 09:22:19 +0000
+++ hipd/netdev.c 2011-08-11 11:33:33 +0000
@@ -99,19 +99,27 @@
99 * size array.99 * size array.
100 * Free slots are signaled by the value -1.100 * Free slots are signaled by the value -1.
101 */101 */
102static int hip_netdev_white_list[HIP_NETDEV_MAX_WHITE_LIST];102struct hip_netdev_whiteliste_entry {
103static int hip_netdev_white_list_count = 0;103 unsigned int if_index;
104 char if_label[IF_NAMESIZE];
105};
106static struct hip_netdev_whiteliste_entry hip_netdev_white_list[HIP_NETDEV_MAX_WHITE_LIST];
107static unsigned int hip_netdev_white_list_count = 0;
104108
105/**109/**
106 * Add a network interface index number to the list of white listed110 * Add a network interface index number plus label to the list of white listed
107 * network interfaces.111 * network interfaces.
108 *112 *
109 * @param if_index the network interface index to be white listed113 * @param if_index the network interface index to be white listed
114 * @param device_name the network interface label to be white listed
110 */115 */
111static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index(int if_index)116static void hip_netdev_white_list_add_index_and_name(const unsigned int if_index,
117 const char *const device_name)
112{118{
113 if (hip_netdev_white_list_count < HIP_NETDEV_MAX_WHITE_LIST) {119 if (hip_netdev_white_list_count < HIP_NETDEV_MAX_WHITE_LIST) {
114 hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count++] = if_index;120 hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count].if_index = if_index;
121 strncpy(hip_netdev_white_list[hip_netdev_white_list_count].if_label, device_name, sizeof(hip_netdev_white_list[0].if_label) - 1);
122 hip_netdev_white_list_count++;
115 } else {123 } else {
116 /* We should NEVER run out of white list slots!!! */124 /* We should NEVER run out of white list slots!!! */
117 HIP_DIE("Error: ran out of space for white listed interfaces!\n");125 HIP_DIE("Error: ran out of space for white listed interfaces!\n");
@@ -119,17 +127,20 @@
119}127}
120128
121/**129/**
122 * Test if the given network interface index is white listed.130 * Test if the given network interface index plus label is white listed.
123 *131 *
124 * @param if_index the index of the network interface to be tested132 * @param if_index the index of the network interface to be tested
133 * @param device_name the label of the network interface to be tested
125 * @return 1 if the index is whitelisted or zero otherwise134 * @return 1 if the index is whitelisted or zero otherwise
126 */135 */
127static int hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(int if_index)136static int hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(const unsigned int if_index, const char *const device_name)
128{137{
129 int i = 0;138 if (hip_netdev_white_list_count > 0) {
130 for (i = 0; i < hip_netdev_white_list_count; i++) {139 for (unsigned int i = 0; i < hip_netdev_white_list_count; i++) {
131 if (hip_netdev_white_list[i] == if_index) {140 if (hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_index == if_index &&
132 return 1;141 !strncmp(hip_netdev_white_list[i].if_label, device_name, sizeof(hip_netdev_white_list[0].if_label))) {
142 return 1;
143 }
133 }144 }
134 }145 }
135 return 0;146 return 0;
@@ -148,19 +159,18 @@
148 int sock = 0;159 int sock = 0;
149 int ret = 0;160 int ret = 0;
150161
151 strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, device_name, IF_NAMESIZE);162 strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, device_name, sizeof(ifr.ifr_name) - 1);
152 sock = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);163 sock = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
153164
154 if (ioctl(sock, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr) == 0) {165 if (ioctl(sock, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr) == 0) {
155 ret = 1;166 ret = 1;
156 hip_netdev_white_list_add_index(ifr.ifr_ifindex);167 hip_netdev_white_list_add_index_and_name(ifr.ifr_ifindex, device_name);
157 HIP_DEBUG("Adding device <%s> to white list with index <%i>.\n",168 HIP_DEBUG("Adding device <%s> to white list with index <%i>.\n",
158 device_name,169 device_name,
159 ifr.ifr_ifindex);170 ifr.ifr_ifindex);
160 } else {171 } else {
161 ret = 0;172 ret = 0;
162 }173 }
163
164 if (sock) {174 if (sock) {
165 close(sock);175 close(sock);
166 }176 }
@@ -634,7 +644,7 @@
634 HIP_IFEL(!(if_index = if_nametoindex(g_iface->ifa_name)),644 HIP_IFEL(!(if_index = if_nametoindex(g_iface->ifa_name)),
635 -1, "if_nametoindex failed\n");645 -1, "if_nametoindex failed\n");
636 /* Check if our interface is in the whitelist */646 /* Check if our interface is in the whitelist */
637 if ((hip_netdev_white_list_count > 0) && (!hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(if_index))) {647 if ((!hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(if_index, g_iface->ifa_name))) {
638 continue;648 continue;
639 }649 }
640650
@@ -1122,6 +1132,40 @@
1122}1132}
11231133
1124/**1134/**
1135 * This functions gives you the interface label for a given IPv4 or IPv6 address.
1136 *
1137 * @param addr address for which you want to know the label
1138 * @param label pointer where the function stores the label
1139 * @return one on success, zero on error and write the label in param label
1140 * if the given addr exists in the system
1141 */
1142int hip_find_label_for_address(const struct sockaddr *const addr, char *const label)
1143{
1144 int res = 0;
1145 struct ifaddrs *myaddrs, *ifa = NULL;
1146
1147 getifaddrs(&myaddrs);
1148 for (ifa = myaddrs; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
1149 if (ifa->ifa_addr == NULL ||
1150 (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET && ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET6)) {
1151 continue;
1152 }
1153
1154 if (!memcmp(addr, ifa->ifa_addr, sizeof(addr))) {
1155 if (strlen(ifa->ifa_name) <= sizeof(label) - 1) {
1156 strncpy(label, ifa->ifa_name, sizeof(label) - 1);
1157 res = 1;
1158 } else {
1159 res = 0;
1160 }
1161 break;
1162 }
1163 }
1164 freeifaddrs(myaddrs);
1165 return res;
1166}
1167
1168/**
1125 * Netlink event handler. Handles IPsec acquire messages (triggering1169 * Netlink event handler. Handles IPsec acquire messages (triggering
1126 * of base exchange) and updates the cache of local addresses when1170 * of base exchange) and updates the cache of local addresses when
1127 * address changes occur.1171 * address changes occur.
@@ -1167,11 +1211,6 @@
1167 rta = IFA_RTA(ifa);1211 rta = IFA_RTA(ifa);
1168 l = msg->nlmsg_len - NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(*ifa));1212 l = msg->nlmsg_len - NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(*ifa));
11691213
1170 /* Check if our interface is in the whitelist */
1171 if ((hip_netdev_white_list_count > 0) &&
1172 (!hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(ifindex))) {
1173 continue;
1174 }
11751214
1176 if ((ifa->ifa_family != AF_INET) &&1215 if ((ifa->ifa_family != AF_INET) &&
1177 (ifa->ifa_family != AF_INET6)) {1216 (ifa->ifa_family != AF_INET6)) {
@@ -1213,6 +1252,18 @@
1213 HIP_DEBUG("Unknown addr family in addr\n");1252 HIP_DEBUG("Unknown addr family in addr\n");
1214 }1253 }
12151254
1255 /* find interface label for address and check if it is whitelisted or not */
1256 if (is_add) {
1257 char label[IF_NAMESIZE];
1258 if (hip_find_label_for_address(addr, label)) {
1259 if ((!hip_netdev_is_in_white_list(ifa->ifa_index, label))) {
1260 HIP_DEBUG("Interface:<%s> is not whitelisted\n", label);
1261 continue;
1262 }
1263 }
1264 }
1265
1266
1216 /* Trying to add an existing address or deleting a non-existing1267 /* Trying to add an existing address or deleting a non-existing
1217 * address */1268 * address */
1218 exists = hip_exists_address_in_list(addr, ifa->ifa_index);1269 exists = hip_exists_address_in_list(addr, ifa->ifa_index);
12191270
=== modified file 'hipd/netdev.h'
--- hipd/netdev.h 2011-05-18 15:12:07 +0000
+++ hipd/netdev.h 2011-08-11 11:33:33 +0000
@@ -56,4 +56,6 @@
56int hip_map_id_to_addr(const hip_hit_t *hit, const hip_lsi_t *lsi,56int hip_map_id_to_addr(const hip_hit_t *hit, const hip_lsi_t *lsi,
57 struct in6_addr *addr);57 struct in6_addr *addr);
5858
59int hip_find_label_for_address(const struct sockaddr *const addr, char *const label);
60
59#endif /* HIP_HIPD_NETDEV_H */61#endif /* HIP_HIPD_NETDEV_H */

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches