Merge lp:~ccheney/ubuntu/lucid/eucalyptus/lucid-sru into lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/eucalyptus

Proposed by Chris Cheney on 2010-06-07
Status: Merged
Merge reported by: Mathias Gug
Merged at revision: not available
Proposed branch: lp:~ccheney/ubuntu/lucid/eucalyptus/lucid-sru
Merge into: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/eucalyptus
Diff against target: 0 lines
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp:~ccheney/ubuntu/lucid/eucalyptus/lucid-sru
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Mathias Gug 2010-06-07 Approve on 2010-06-08
Dave Walker 2010-06-07 Pending
Review via email: mp+26956@code.launchpad.net

This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2010-06-04.

Description of the change

SRU for lucid

  * Revert: node/handlers_kvm.c: fix console bug (was only showing first 64K)
  * clc/modules/www/src/main/java/edu/ucsb/eucalyptus/admin/server/EucalyptusWebBackendImpl.java:
    - fix user enumeration and account brute force, LP: #579942
  * debian/eucalyptus-sc.upstart: Bump maximum number of loop devices for
    SC to 512, LP: #586134

To post a comment you must log in.
Mathias Gug (mathiaz) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

I would add a reference to the LP bug number for the patch that is reverted. Otherwise the patch looks good to me.

Both bug 586134 and bug 579942 need to have a proper SRU report written up.

review: Approve
Chris Cheney (ccheney) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

> I would add a reference to the LP bug number for the patch that is reverted.
> Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
>
> Both bug 586134 and bug 579942 need to have a proper SRU report written up.

I have written up the two SRUs.

Mathias Gug (mathiaz) wrote :

Diff looks good to me. Uploaded to lucid-proposed.

review: Approve
154. By Chris Cheney on 2010-06-08

Merged.

Preview Diff

Empty

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches