Code review comment for lp:~canonical-platform-qa/ubuntu-community-testing/initial-reporting

Revision history for this message
Christopher Lee (veebers) wrote :

> Mostly looks great - some questions about use of docstrings though
Good catch with the docstrings. Have added more and improved the existing.

Regarding docstrings for 'private' methods; I see no issue with having them, They are a well known format which can streamline a developer reading them and contain details regarding the intention of the method itself.

« Back to merge proposal