Kai-Heng Feng reported that it takes a long time (> 1 s) to resume
Thunderbolt-connected devices from both runtime suspend and system sleep
(s2idle).
This was because some Downstream Ports that support > 5 GT/s do not also
support Data Link Layer Link Active reporting. Per PCIe r5.0 sec 6.6.1:
With a Downstream Port that supports Link speeds greater than 5.0 GT/s,
software must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link training completes
before sending a Configuration Request to the device immediately below
that Port. Software can determine when Link training completes by polling
the Data Link Layer Link Active bit or by setting up an associated
interrupt (see Section 6.7.3.3).
Sec 7.5.3.6 requires such Ports to support DLL Link Active reporting, but
at least the Intel JHL6240 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge [8086:15c0] and the Intel
JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge [8086:15ea] do not.
Previously we tried to wait for Link training to complete, but since there
was no DLL Link Active reporting, all we could do was wait the worst-case
1000 ms, then another 100 ms.
Instead of using the supported speeds to determine whether to wait for Link
training, check whether the port supports DLL Link Active reporting. The
Ports in question do not, so we'll wait only the 100 ms required for Ports
that support Link speeds <= 5 GT/s.
This of course assumes these Ports always train the Link within 100 ms even
if they are operating at > 5 GT/s, which is not required by the spec.
The caller of pcie_wait_for_link_delay() specifies the time to wait after
the link becomes active. When the downstream port doesn't support link
active reporting, obviously we can't tell when the link becomes active, so
we waited the worst-case time (1000 ms) plus 100 ms, ignoring the delay
from the caller.
Instead, wait for 1000 ms + the delay from the caller.
Fixes: 4827d63891b6 ("PCI/PM: Add pcie_wait_for_link_delay()")
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <email address hidden>
(cherry picked from commit f044baaff1eb7ae5aa7a36f1b7ad5bd8eeb672c4
linux-next)
Signed-off-by: Koba Ko <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <email address hidden>
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c: In function rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:5396:24: warning: variable vif set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c: In function rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:5397:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c: In function rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:5400:6: warning: variable len set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
They are introduced by commit e542e66b7c2e ("rtl8xxxu:
add bluetooth co-existence support for single antenna"), but never used,
so remove them.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <email address hidden>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <email address hidden>
(cherry picked from commit eac08515d7bd665d306cefa2ae9f3de56e875d6d)
Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <email address hidden>
