Merge lp:~azzar1/unity/fix-875467-2 into lp:unity
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Andrea Azzarone |
Approved revision: | no longer in the source branch. |
Merged at revision: | 1793 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~azzar1/unity/fix-875467-2 |
Merge into: | lp:unity |
Diff against target: |
329 lines (+89/-43) 11 files modified
manual-tests/EjectNotificationIcon.txt (+27/-0) plugins/unityshell/src/BFBLauncherIcon.cpp (+1/-1) plugins/unityshell/src/BamfLauncherIcon.cpp (+2/-4) plugins/unityshell/src/DesktopLauncherIcon.cpp (+1/-1) plugins/unityshell/src/DeviceLauncherIcon.cpp (+27/-12) plugins/unityshell/src/DeviceLauncherIcon.h (+1/-0) plugins/unityshell/src/LauncherController.cpp (+1/-1) plugins/unityshell/src/SimpleLauncherIcon.cpp (+13/-14) plugins/unityshell/src/SimpleLauncherIcon.h (+8/-6) plugins/unityshell/src/TrashLauncherIcon.cpp (+4/-4) standalone-clients/CMakeLists.txt (+4/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~azzar1/unity/fix-875467-2 |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Tim Penhey (community) | Approve | ||
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+82732@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
Use unity::IconLoader to load device launcher icon that will be used to show an OSD notification. If it's not able to load an icon it shows a OSD notification without an icon.
This merge propose comes from this one (https:/
Because unity::IconLoader has already been tested and in a unit test we should not test an external module (osd notification library), i don't know if we need a unit test for this change. In the case let me know.
I was wondering, shouldn't be the notification, this case, be shown as a priority one? private- synchronous" or the urgency should do that.
I mean, making it to be positioned where the volume or brightness bubbles are shown, to exceed the queue of the all other applications that are firing notifications. The hint "x-canonical-