Code review comment for lp:~andreserl/maas/lp1570609

Revision history for this message
Mike Pontillo (mpontillo) wrote :

Let me start by saying that Gavin is absolutely correct.

However, if fixing it Gavin's way will take more than an hour or so, I would suggest that we land Andres's fix first, and then prioritize Gavin's follow-on fix as a Medium/Low. I think there are more important bugs to work on right now.

Reasoning: it's unlikely that the AMT will return XML documents in inconsistent encodings. Since this is a power driver that is very specific to the AMT, it is likely to work for the foreseeable future if we hard-code the encoding we know the AMT is using today. (if it's using UTF-8, for example, it is unlikely to change for the lifetime of the AMT product, IMHO.)

« Back to merge proposal