Merge lp:~andreagrandi/ubuntu/quantal/libdbg/typo-fix into lp:ubuntu/quantal/libdbg
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Merged at revision: | 4 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~andreagrandi/ubuntu/quantal/libdbg/typo-fix |
| Merge into: | lp:ubuntu/quantal/libdbg |
| Diff against target: |
24 lines (+7/-1) 2 files modified
debian/changelog (+6/-0) debian/control (+1/-1) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~andreagrandi/ubuntu/quantal/libdbg/typo-fix |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Pitt | 2012-08-24 | Approve on 2012-09-10 | |
| Daniel Holbach | Needs Fixing on 2012-09-07 | ||
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the Change
Fixed a typo in debian/control in 'Description' field.
- 5. By Andrea Grandi on 2012-09-09
-
Fixed a typo in debian/control in 'Description'
| Andrea Grandi (andreagrandi) wrote : | # |
> Thanks a lot for your work on this.
>
> This packages Contains the symlinks, headers, and object files needed to
> compile and link programs which use libdbg.
>
> is probably not how I would fix it. Grammatically it's not right.
>
> As it talks just about one package, I'd change it to
>
> This package contains the symlinks, headers, and object files needed to
> compile and link programs which use libdbg.
I've fixed the description again as you suggested me. I hope it's ok.
- 6. By Andrea Grandi on 2012-09-09
-
Fix a typo in debian/control Description
| Andrea Grandi (andreagrandi) wrote : | # |
for Daniel: I've unified the rows in the changelog and I've substituted "precise" with "UNRELEASED" as someone suggested me on #ubuntu-devel
<mitya57> Andy80: the branch looks ok, but I think you should remove the duplicate changelog entry and set target to UNRELEASED instead of precise
| Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : | # |
Thanks! Looks fine to me now. The package is not in Debian, so fixing this on the Ubuntu side is appropriate.
| Andrea Grandi (andreagrandi) wrote : | # |
@Martin: I've also sent the patch to Debian with "submittodebian". So... they will probably refuse it as there is no package to patch there :\


Thanks a lot for your work on this.
This packages Contains the symlinks, headers, and object files needed to
compile and link programs which use libdbg.
is probably not how I would fix it. Grammatically it's not right.
As it talks just about one package, I'd change it to
This package contains the symlinks, headers, and object files needed to
compile and link programs which use libdbg.