Merge lp:~ams-codesourcery/gcc-linaro/neon-not64-4.7 into lp:gcc-linaro/4.7

[Andrew Stubbs]

Implement NEON DImode not operator.

Patch posted upstream here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg01490.html

[Michael Hope (michaelh1)]

cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r114970 and queued it for build.

The diff against the ancestor r114969 is available at:
 http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7.diff

and will be built on the following builders:
 a9-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64

You can track the build queue at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/scheduler

cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro/4.7+bzr114969
cbuild-state: check

[Michael Hope (michaelh1)]

cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-natty-cbuild259-oort1-x86_64r1.

The build results are available at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/x86_64-natty-cbuild259-oort1-x86_64r1

The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro/4.7+bzr114969

The full diff is at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/x86_64-natty-cbuild259-oort1-x86_64r1/testsuite-diff.txt

The full testsuite results are at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/x86_64-natty-cbuild259-oort1-x86_64r1/gcc-testsuite.txt

cbuild-checked: x86_64-natty-cbuild259-oort1-x86_64r1

[Michael Hope (michaelh1)]

cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda03-cortexa9r1.

The build results are available at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda03-cortexa9r1

The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro/4.7+bzr114969

The full diff is at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda03-cortexa9r1/testsuite-diff.txt

The full testsuite results are at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda03-cortexa9r1/gcc-testsuite.txt

cbuild-checked: armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda03-cortexa9r1

[Michael Hope (michaelh1)]

cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda05-armv5r2.

The build results are available at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda05-armv5r2

The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro/4.7+bzr114969

The full diff is at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda05-armv5r2/testsuite-diff.txt

The full testsuite results are at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda05-armv5r2/gcc-testsuite.txt

cbuild-checked: armv7l-natty-cbuild259-tcpanda05-armv5r2

[Michael Hope (michaelh1)]

cbuild successfully built this on i686-natty-cbuild259-oort2-i686r1.

The build results are available at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/i686-natty-cbuild259-oort2-i686r1

The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro/4.7+bzr114969

The full diff is at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/i686-natty-cbuild259-oort2-i686r1/testsuite-diff.txt

The full testsuite results are at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114970~ams-codesourcery~neon-not64-4.7/logs/i686-natty-cbuild259-oort2-i686r1/gcc-testsuite.txt

cbuild-checked: i686-natty-cbuild259-oort2-i686r1

[Ulrich Weigand (uweigand)]

What's the upstream status? It looks like Richard requested some changes ...

[Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery)]

Yes, this patch tests out ok, but it's not been approved upstream.

I need to either change it or show why it's already correct ....

review: Needs Fixing