Merge lp:~ams-codesourcery/gcc-linaro/merge-from-fsf-4.6-20111003 into lp:gcc-linaro/4.6
- merge-from-fsf-4.6-20111003
- Merge into 4.6
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Ulrich Weigand |
Approved revision: | not available |
Merge reported by: | Andrew Stubbs |
Merged at revision: | not available |
Proposed branch: | lp:~ams-codesourcery/gcc-linaro/merge-from-fsf-4.6-20111003 |
Merge into: | lp:gcc-linaro/4.6 |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~ams-codesourcery/gcc-linaro/merge-from-fsf-4.6-20111003 |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Ulrich Weigand (community) | Approve | ||
Andrew Stubbs | Pending | ||
Michael Hope | Pending | ||
Review via email:
|
This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2011-10-03.
Commit message
Description of the change
Merge from FSF GCC 4.6.1 (svn branches/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro+bzr106816
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
There's something strange here. The diff is empty except the ChangeLog entry:
http://
...and the test results are unchanged which is suspicious.
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-natty-
The build results are available at:
http://
The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro+bzr106816
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: i686-natty-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
> There's something strange here. The diff is empty except the ChangeLog entry:
> http://
> ~merge-
>
> ...and the test results are unchanged which is suspicious.
There's clearly some BZR silliness going on here. Let me try that again ....
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery) wrote : | # |
Yeah, somehow the merge was rejected and since I wasn't expecting it to fail I just push it anyway. Oh well,fixed now .... I think.
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r106817 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r106816 is available at:
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
You can track the build queue at:
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr106816
cbuild-state: check
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro+bzr106816
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: armv7l-
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
Ah, the same revno as before so the cbuild reused the previous snapshot.
Nuked and bumped.
cbuild-state: queue
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r106817 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r106816 is available at:
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
a9-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64
You can track the build queue at:
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr106816
cbuild-state: check
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C (test for excess errors)
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C execution test
+PASS: g++.dg/
+UNSUPPORTED: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C (test for excess errors)
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C execution test
+PASS: g++.dg/
+UNSUPPORTED: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C (test for excess errors)
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C execution test
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-natty-
The build results are available at:
http://
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
-PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C (test for excess errors)
+PASS: g++.dg/eh/defarg1.C execution test
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
+PASS: g++.dg/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
I've had a read of the diffs.
For ARMv5: all are a change in testsuite, PASSes, XPASSes, or UNSUPPORTED.
For Cortex-A9: all are a change in testsuite, PASSes, XPASSes, or UNSUPPORTED.
For i686: all are a change in testsuite, PASSes, XPASSes, or UNSUPPORTED.
For x86_64: all are a change in testsuite, PASSes, XPASSes, or UNSUPPORTED.
The change in results are OK.
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r106817 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r106816 is available at: builds. linaro. org/toolchain/ snapshots/ gcc-linaro- 4.6+bzr106817~ ams-codesourcer y~merge- from-fsf- 4.6-20111003. diff
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
a9-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64
You can track the build queue at: ex.seabright. co.nz/helpers/ scheduler
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro- 4.6+bzr106817~ ams-codesourcer y~merge- from-fsf- 4.6-20111003
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr106816
cbuild-state: check