Merge lp:~aluria/charms/precise/nrpe-external-master/donotremove-hostdefs into lp:charms/nrpe-external-master
| Status: | Needs review |
|---|---|
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aluria/charms/precise/nrpe-external-master/donotremove-hostdefs |
| Merge into: | lp:charms/nrpe-external-master |
| Diff against target: |
20 lines (+9/-1) 1 file modified
hooks/config-changed (+9/-1) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aluria/charms/precise/nrpe-external-master/donotremove-hostdefs |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Vander Giessen | Disapprove on 2016-10-06 | ||
| Liam Young | 2016-04-05 | Approve on 2016-06-21 | |
| Review Queue (community) | automated testing | Approve on 2016-04-10 | |
| Marco Ceppi | 2016-08-04 | Pending | |
| Tom Haddon | 2016-08-04 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
- 43. By Alvaro Uría on 2016-04-05
-
[aluria,r=] selective host defs removals
- 44. By Alvaro Uría on 2016-04-05
-
[aluria,r=] corrected and tested service defs matching
- 45. By Alvaro Uría on 2016-04-06
-
[aluria,r=] concat rm or set -e will make script fail
| Review Queue (review-queue) wrote : | # |
The results (PASS) are in and available here: http://
| Cory Johns (johnsca) wrote : | # |
The listed maintainer of this is Tom Haddon. Does this charm make sense to be owned by an "is-team" or similar? I'm reluctant to move forward with merging this until we verify the proper point of contact and can sort out the proper place to move the repo to out of lp:charms and proper namespace to put this into the store under, per the new non-ingestion charm store process (see https:/
Alternatively, Marco, is there any exemption for older precise charms for the new process?
| Antonio Rosales (arosales) wrote : | # |
Tom,
Should this charm be deprecated in-liu of https:/
aluria,
Is the precise version of this charm essential, or would Trusty or Xenail work for you. If so suggest to use https:/
-thanks,
Antonio
| Alvaro Uría (aluria) wrote : | # |
> Tom,
> Should this charm be deprecated in-liu of https:/
>
> aluria,
> Is the precise version of this charm essential, or would Trusty or Xenail work
> for you. If so suggest to use https:/
> development focus.
BootStack has already migrated to trusty nrpe version for their deploys. This MP fixed a bug on old version still used on a few of our Stacks but could be safely deprecated if wanted (and we will work on transitioning rather than fixing old code).
Thank you,
-Alvaro.
>
> -thanks,
> Antonio
| Tom Haddon (mthaddon) wrote : | # |
Yes, nrpe-external-
| Pete Vander Giessen (petevg) wrote : | # |
Since this is a PR against a deprecated charm, we should close this entry in the review queue out.
Unmerged revisions
- 45. By Alvaro Uría on 2016-04-06
-
[aluria,r=] concat rm or set -e will make script fail
- 44. By Alvaro Uría on 2016-04-05
-
[aluria,r=] corrected and tested service defs matching
- 43. By Alvaro Uría on 2016-04-05
-
[aluria,r=] selective host defs removals
- 42. By Alvaro Uría on 2016-04-05
-
[aluria,r=] multiple subordinates per host will remove previous host definitions

The results (PASS) are in and available here: http:// juju-ci. vapour. ws:8080/ job/charm- bundle- test-aws/ 3532/