Code review comment for lp:~albertomilone/jockey/pkg-version

Discussed on IRC. IMHO this will introduce duplicate structures into the core code which we won't ever get rid of again, and only for a corner case. Remember that you explicitly wanted to name the package "current", not "195"; so we should actually call it "current". Otherwise it'll create more confusion than it solves, since the package names in Jockey do not (always) reflect the package names in software-center etc.

If i18n is a concern, we have the ability to translate package descriptions, so maybe we should use that?