Code review comment for lp:~alan-griffiths/miral/miral-toolkit-dev

> > *Needs Discussion*
> >
> > Following a (separate) discussion with Gerry, I wonder if this should
> > incorporate some renaming; E.g.
> >
> > The package could be: cpp-libmirclient-dev
> > The namespace could be mir::client
> >
> > What does the team think?
>
> cpp-wrapper-libmirclient-dev would be clearer. cpp-libmirclient-dev would be
> my second preference.

I also prefer mir::client as the namespace which reads a bit better.