Code review comment for lp:~alan-griffiths/mir/fix-1603922

> It's regrettable that the new function name is hard to understand, because the
> old good name is already taken.
>
> Can we think of a better name? mir_connection_create_spec_for_tooltip2 ?

1. the corresponding surface type is: mir_surface_type_tip

2. From the (internal) discussion that led to this MP:

    On 17/07/16 13:17, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
    > Maybe that would be a good time to start calling the type “tip”, to
    > avoid the impression that it’s just for tooltips.