Merge ~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/samba:zesty-revert-static-winbind-1677329 into ~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/samba:ubuntu/zesty-devel
| Status: | Work in progress | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed branch: | ~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/samba:zesty-revert-static-winbind-1677329 | ||||||||
| Merge into: | ~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/samba:ubuntu/zesty-devel | ||||||||
| Diff against target: |
144 lines (+12/-96) 4 files modified
debian/changelog (+12/-0) debian/patches/series (+0/-1) debian/rules (+0/-1) dev/null (+0/-94) |
||||||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChristianEhrhardt | 2017-06-21 | Approve on 2017-07-13 | |
| Canonical Server Core Reviewers | 2017-08-03 | Pending | |
| Canonical Server Team | 2017-08-03 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the Change
Remove the fix for LP #1584485 as it builds a broken pam_winbind module. There is a revised version of that patch attached to #1584485 but it has not been vetted yet, so for now it's best to revert (again) so that pam_winbind can be used. (LP: #1677329, LP: #1644428)
- d/p/fix-
- d/rules: remove winbind static build option
I just attached the revised patch to #1584485 and reopened the artful (devel) task with a comment, but in the "incomplete" state because of the clarifications I asked in comment #43.
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | # |
> Still nothing happened upstream :-/
> You are waiting on https:/
> technical/
Yes, I doubt it will get traction.
> If anything I'm a bit lost on "There is a fixed version of that patch
> attached" - since there is no attachement. You either mean one of the branches
I meant attached to the bug, but in the form of an MP. This one:
https:/
> you linked or the upstream discussion that is linked. If you want to fix this
> uncertainty you might update the changelog here before a merge and upload
> pointing to the suggested final fix in a way clear to somebody not involved so
> far.
Good idea, will do.
>
> Anyway I agree with reverting it in general to make it "as usable as before"
> for now.
>
> I can not upload that for you yet (core-dev only), but I can approve the
> change.
> And you can ping Nish/Robie to do the merge and sponsoring rather soon IMHO.
>
> One thing to be sure on that - will you follow on to this under the banner of
> bug 1584485 to fix it the right way eventually?
I will have to reopen it. Do you agree with that approach? It might be best even to attach my reworked patch there.
| ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) wrote : | # |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Andreas Hasenack <email address hidden>
wrote:
> > One thing to be sure on that - will you follow on to this under the
> banner of
> > bug 1584485 to fix it the right way eventually?
>
> I will have to reopen it. Do you agree with that approach? It might be
> best even to attach my reworked patch there.
Yes exactly that - reopen, explain, attach (there)
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | # |
I had to push again because in the meantime zesty got a new update, so my changelog entry conflicted.
- 24e5c1b... by Steve Beattie on 2017-07-13
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | # |
Another rebase due to an upload by the security team, this time we are at 0.17.04.5.
| Nish Aravamudan (nacc) wrote : | # |
FYI, 0.17.04.5 was uploaded to zesty-p, I'm running the importer now to catchup and if it applies cleanly, I'll rebase your branch and fix up the changelog.
| Nish Aravamudan (nacc) wrote : | # |
Ah actually, I see this was already sponsored.
| Nish Aravamudan (nacc) wrote : | # |
Taking this off the active review queue.
Robie, can you decide (if you remember) what to do with sponsored but not tagged uploads? Do we want to affect future re-imports?
Unmerged commits
- 9045a6f... by Andreas Hasenack on 2017-06-21
- 4a1f1ce... by Andreas Hasenack on 2017-06-21
- 24e5c1b... by Steve Beattie on 2017-07-13
- 6cb1945... by Andreas Hasenack on 2017-06-30
- 0bcfc04... by Marc Deslauriers on 2017-05-19
- 42c867a... by Marc Deslauriers on 2017-04-21
- dda1d84... by Nish Aravamudan on 2017-03-06


Still nothing happened upstream :-/ /lists. samba.org/ archive/ samba-technical /2017-June/ 121139. html right?
You are waiting on https:/
If anything I'm a bit lost on "There is a fixed version of that patch attached" - since there is no attachement. You either mean one of the branches you linked or the upstream discussion that is linked. If you want to fix this uncertainty you might update the changelog here before a merge and upload pointing to the suggested final fix in a way clear to somebody not involved so far.
Anyway I agree with reverting it in general to make it "as usable as before" for now.
I can not upload that for you yet (core-dev only), but I can approve the change.
And you can ping Nish/Robie to do the merge and sponsoring rather soon IMHO.
One thing to be sure on that - will you follow on to this under the banner of bug 1584485 to fix it the right way eventually?