i use and prefer nss-pam-ldapd, so removing nssov would break things for my installations. it doesn't really matter to me if nssov is loaded/enabled/configured by the packaging system [in fact, i would prefer it not be, myself], but it's not clear to me what problem it causes to include it in the package, so people who want it can use it.
as a side note, it would be disappointing to see sssd pushed over nss-pam-ldapd, generally speaking.
i use and prefer nss-pam-ldapd, so removing nssov would break things for my installations. it doesn't really matter to me if nssov is loaded/ enabled/ configured by the packaging system [in fact, i would prefer it not be, myself], but it's not clear to me what problem it causes to include it in the package, so people who want it can use it.
as a side note, it would be disappointing to see sssd pushed over nss-pam-ldapd, generally speaking.