Merge lp:~ahasenack/landscape-charm/new-dense-target-experiment into lp:~landscape/landscape-charm/trunk
Proposed by
Andreas Hasenack
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Andreas Hasenack |
Approved revision: | 203 |
Merged at revision: | 201 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~ahasenack/landscape-charm/new-dense-target-experiment |
Merge into: | lp:~landscape/landscape-charm/trunk |
Diff against target: |
72 lines (+35/-9) 2 files modified
README.md (+29/-9) config/landscape-deployments.yaml (+6/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~ahasenack/landscape-charm/new-dense-target-experiment |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Free Ekanayaka (community) | Approve | ||
Geoff Teale (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+228736@code.launchpad.net |
Commit message
New deployer target called "landscape-dense", that deploys a working LDS on the bootstrap node on providers other than MAAS.
Description of the change
This adds a new deployer target called "landscape-dense". It's just like "landscape-
The trick is simple: we only need the frontend (apache2) to be reachable from the "outside". So I co-locate apache2 on the bootstrap node, and deploy the rest on containers.
I wondered if we need to keep the maas-only target. It's cleaner, in the sense that no hulk-smashing is done. But landscape-dense works everywhere. Discuss! :)
To post a comment you must log in.
+1 Tested on scapestack, works a treat!