Merge lp:~adam-delvecchio/bzr/662448-sshkey-doc into lp:bzr
| Status: | Work in progress | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed branch: | lp:~adam-delvecchio/bzr/662448-sshkey-doc | ||||
| Merge into: | lp:bzr | ||||
| Diff against target: |
113 lines (+109/-0) 1 file modified
doc/en/user-guide/ssh_keys.txt (+109/-0) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~adam-delvecchio/bzr/662448-sshkey-doc | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Pool | 2010-10-18 | Needs Fixing on 2010-10-18 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the Change
Fixed bug #662448
| Martin Pool (mbp) wrote : | # |
oh, also this probably needs to be mentioned in 'index.txt' to be included within the manual
| Adam Del Vecchio (adam-delvecchio) wrote : | # |
I will fix and re-commit :)
Also, as to the random suggestion, it works (in my experience), merely because on some servers (I've seen it at least twice), ssh doesn't like the public key in the same directory as the private key. Its mentioned a few times in various mailing lists and documents around the web, I believe :)
| Martin Pool (mbp) wrote : | # |
Hi, I just wanted to check this wasn't blocked on anything. If you'd like me to finish it off, just let me know.
| Vincent Ladeuil (vila) wrote : | # |
@Adam: Do you need help here (just say so :) ?
Also, I think we need you to execute the Canonical's Contributor Agreement: <http://
Unmerged revisions
- 5505. By Adam Del Vecchio on 2010-10-18
-
Fixed bug #662448, added an ssh_keys help document

Thanks!
The ReST markup is a bit wrong: in the wiki the headings have bars next to them whereas in rest they need an underline of the same length as the heading. Example terminal output or files should have a :: on the preceding line; inline examples should be in ``double backticks``. See http:// docutils. sourceforge. net/docs/ user/rst/ quickref. html
Perhaps there are a few more points to make in the introduction:
* you can authenticate over ssh by a key pair or by a password (or potentially by other mechanisms); the server chooses what it will accept
* an ssh key is an assymetric key: there is a 'public' part you put on the server and a private part you keep
I think that using a master connection, while really useful to document, is not normally what people want and describing it first may cause counfusion?
+
+In some cases, ssh may refuse to work if your public key is in your ~/.ssh directory.
+
+ mv ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub ~/id_rsa.pub
+should fix the problem.
I guess that's on the wiki page but I can't imagine why it would work and it seems like a kind of random suggestion.
s/exxe/exe