Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/urldispatcher_hideeverything into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti on 2015-04-01 |
| Approved revision: | 1693 |
| Merged at revision: | 1712 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/urldispatcher_hideeverything |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
195 lines (+89/-22) 6 files modified
qml/Dash/Dash.qml (+26/-13) qml/Dash/DashContent.qml (+0/-5) tests/mocks/Unity/fake_scope.cpp (+9/-0) tests/mocks/Unity/fake_scope.h (+4/-2) tests/qmltests/Dash/tst_Dash.qml (+49/-1) tests/qmltests/Dash/tst_GenericScopeView.qml (+1/-1) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/urldispatcher_hideeverything |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Zanetti (community) | 2015-03-19 | Approve on 2015-04-01 | |
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-03-27 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Make url-dispatching scope activation when the dash is not on the main scopes
i.e. temp scope or preview or manage scopes
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
- 1691. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-03-19
-
fix variable ^_^
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
tested, works. do we have a change to test this?
- 1692. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-03-27
-
Test uri dispatcher does what it has to do
The uri dispatcher calls are not dbus activated but fake signals,
but here we're not testing the uri dispatcher itself that is on the SDK
just checking that when it's activated it does what it should - 1693. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-03-27
-
And forgot i need this too
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1693
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
lovely. thanks a lot!
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
no. looks unrelated. unity didn't seem to start within the expected time
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes

FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1691 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- ci/5466/ jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- vivid-touch/ 1872 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-phablet- qmluitests- vivid/630 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-amd64- ci/631 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-i386- ci/631 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- runner- vivid-mako/ 1652 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 1870 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 1870/artifact/ work/output/ *zip*/output. zip s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/touch- flash-device/ 19002
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild: s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/unity8- ci/5466/ rebuild
http://