Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/stabilize-launcher-test-more into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti on 2015-09-29 | ||||
| Approved revision: | 1980 | ||||
| Merged at revision: | 1990 | ||||
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/stabilize-launcher-test-more | ||||
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 | ||||
| Prerequisite: | lp:~mzanetti/unity8/stabilize-launcher-test | ||||
| Diff against target: |
14 lines (+4/-1) 1 file modified
tests/qmltests/Launcher/tst_Launcher.qml (+4/-1) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/stabilize-launcher-test-more | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-09-29 | |
| Michael Zanetti (community) | 2015-09-29 | Approve on 2015-09-29 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Make Launcher:
We need the x to be exactly 0 and compare() does say true for values very close to 0
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1980
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://

* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
waiting, shouldn't affect anything bad tho. I've ran the tests here.
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes