Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/qt56 into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti on 2016-04-06 | ||||
| Approved revision: | 2327 | ||||
| Merged at revision: | 2354 | ||||
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/qt56 | ||||
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 | ||||
| Diff against target: |
25 lines (+2/-2) 2 files modified
tests/libs/UbuntuGestures/tst_TouchRegistry.cpp (+1/-1) tests/mocks/Unity/InputInfo/qinputdeviceinfo_mock.cpp (+1/-1) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/qt56 | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unity8 CI Bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2016-04-20 | |
| Michael Zanetti (community) | Approve on 2016-04-06 | ||
| Timo Jyrinki | 2016-04-04 | Approve on 2016-04-04 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Compile with Qt 5.6
And actually emit the signal
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
N/A
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
- 2327. By Albert Astals Cid on 2016-04-04
-
Do not QCOMPARE a bool against 1
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2326
https:/
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
FAILURE: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2327
https:/
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
FAILURE: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
Looks good to me. tests passing here.
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
unrelated failure
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes
| Timo Jyrinki (timo-jyrinki) wrote : | # |
Could this be landed so that it would be easier to rebuild against Qt 5.6 with less manual patching? Or would this MP need further changes to #ifdef by version?
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2327
https:/
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: https:/
UNSTABLE: https:/
FAILURE: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/

Looks good! https:/ /launchpad. net/~ci- train-ppa- service/ +archive/ ubuntu/ landing- 011/+sourcepub/ 6280916/ +listing- archive- extra