Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/properRangesHorizontalCategories into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Andrea Cimitan on 2015-01-26 |
| Approved revision: | 1548 |
| Merged at revision: | 1588 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/properRangesHorizontalCategories |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Prerequisite: | lp:~aacid/unity8/dash_ranges_on_move |
| Diff against target: |
291 lines (+116/-55) 5 files modified
qml/Components/Carousel.qml (+6/-2) qml/Dash/CardCarousel.qml (+6/-2) qml/Dash/CardHorizontalList.qml (+7/-2) qml/Dash/DashRenderer.qml (+6/-1) qml/Dash/GenericScopeView.qml (+91/-48) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/properRangesHorizontalCategories |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Cimitan (community) | 2015-01-14 | Approve on 2015-01-26 | |
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Approve on 2015-01-14 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Implement proper updateRanges for horizontal items (i.e. Carousel, Horizontal List)
Saves lots of unneeded card creation, e.g DashContent:
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
Prerequisite
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
- 1548. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-01-14
-
Didn't want to commit this
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1547
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
The failed qmluitest should go away with r1548, let's see CI re-run the tests
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
PASSED: Continuous integration, rev:1548
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Andrea Cimitan (cimi) wrote : | # |
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
y
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
y
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
y

The diff in updateRanges is not great, basically what i did is add the
if (item.growsVert ically) {
// old code untouched here
} else {
// new code
}