Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/passphrase_kewboard into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti on 2015-03-26 | ||||
| Approved revision: | 1692 | ||||
| Merged at revision: | 1713 | ||||
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/passphrase_kewboard | ||||
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 | ||||
| Diff against target: |
43 lines (+6/-2) 2 files modified
qml/Components/Dialogs.qml (+2/-0) tests/qmltests/Components/tst_Dialogs.qml (+4/-2) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/passphrase_kewboard | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Approve on 2015-03-26 | |
| Michael Zanetti (community) | 2015-03-20 | Approve on 2015-03-26 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Focus the shutdown dialog
This way the keyboard will hide and we won't have a weird situation in which the keyaboard is half shown in shutdown dialog when we try get it on the passphrase dialog in the LockScreen
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
can you please add a tryCompare(dialog, "activeFocus", true) to the test after it opens the dialog?
- 1691. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-03-26
-
test item gets the focus as suggested by mzanetti
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
Done
- 1692. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-03-26
-
unbreak tryDialogs
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
as much as it can. qmltests are fine. AP not affected by this afaict.
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
PASSED: Continuous integration, rev:1692
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://

FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1690 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- ci/5470/ jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- vivid-touch/ 1888/console jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-phablet- qmluitests- vivid/634 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-amd64- ci/635 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-i386- ci/635 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- runner- vivid-mako/ 1666/console jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 1886 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 1886/artifact/ work/output/ *zip*/output. zip s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/touch- flash-device/ 19033
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild: s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/unity8- ci/5470/ rebuild
http://