Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/oxide_regression_workaround into lp:unity8
Proposed by
Albert Astals Cid
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti |
| Approved revision: | 1792 |
| Merged at revision: | 1810 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/oxide_regression_workaround |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
9 lines (+1/-1) 1 file modified
tests/qmltests/CMakeLists.txt (+1/-1) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/oxide_regression_workaround |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Zanetti (community) | Approve | ||
| PS Jenkins bot (community) | continuous-integration | Approve | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit message
workaround oxide 1.7 issue
See bug #1459142
Description of the change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Test only
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
* Did you have a look at the warnings when running tests? Can they be reduced?
No new warnings introduced
To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote | # |
review:
Approve
(continuous-integration)
Preview Diff
[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
waiting for Jenkins... Not top-approving yet.
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes