Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/fix_cropped_image_binding_loop into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Gerry Boland on 2015-10-22 |
| Approved revision: | 2006 |
| Merged at revision: | 2034 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/fix_cropped_image_binding_loop |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
32 lines (+15/-4) 1 file modified
plugins/Dash/CroppedImageMinimumSourceSize.qml (+15/-4) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/fix_cropped_image_binding_loop |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-11-02 | |
| Gerry Boland | Approve on 2015-10-22 | ||
| Michał Sawicz | meh, ohkay | 2015-10-21 | Approve on 2015-10-21 |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
CroppedImageMin
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
| Gerry Boland (gerboland) wrote : | # |
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2005
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
- 2006. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-10-22
-
add commetn
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
> Think a comment explaining "why not bindings?" would do no harm.
>
> Because I'm sure if I saw this code in a year's time, I'd say "I'll use
> bindings to make it better!" :)
Comment added
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2006
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2006
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2006
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://

Think a comment explaining "why not bindings?" would do no harm.
Because I'm sure if I saw this code in a year's time, I'd say "I'll use bindings to make it better!" :)