Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/dropgcc49more into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti on 2015-08-14 |
| Approved revision: | 1917 |
| Merged at revision: | 1925 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/dropgcc49more |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
14 lines (+0/-5) 1 file modified
debian/rules (+0/-5) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/dropgcc49more |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-08-14 | |
| Michael Zanetti (community) | 2015-08-14 | Approve on 2015-08-14 | |
| Matthias Klose | 2015-08-14 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Drop gcc 4.9 requirement in debian/rules
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
yes, still builds for me.
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
nope. ci broken atm :(
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1917
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://

FWIW
[11:38:30] <tsdgeos> doko: is https:/ /code.launchpad .net/~aacid/ unity8/ dropgcc49more/ +merge/ 268047 correct? i think i've seen some other projects do this too
[11:39:23] <doko> tsdgeos, yes