Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/borderSourceRegression into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Andrea Cimitan on 2015-05-19 |
| Approved revision: | 1777 |
| Merged at revision: | 1816 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/borderSourceRegression |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
99 lines (+17/-0) 5 files modified
plugins/Dash/CardCreator.js (+2/-0) tests/plugins/Dash/cardcreator/1.res (+2/-0) tests/plugins/Dash/cardcreator/3.res (+2/-0) tests/plugins/Dash/cardcreator/5.res (+2/-0) tests/qmltests/Dash/tst_GenericScopeView.qml (+9/-0) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/borderSourceRegression |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Cimitan (community) | 2015-05-12 | Approve on 2015-05-19 | |
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-05-12 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Fix regression introduced by the concierge change
borderSource was being assigned incorrectly, bubbled up the property with an alias to the parent item so that less code has to be changed
Description of the Change
How to test:
run
make tryGenericScopeView
with and without the patch
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
N/A
- 1777. By Albert Astals Cid on 2015-05-12
-
Add test for next time refactor doesn't break it
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1777
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Andrea Cimitan (cimi) wrote : | # |
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
Y
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
AP
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
Y

FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1776 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- ci/5714/ jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- vivid-touch/ 2740 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-phablet- qmluitests- vivid/880 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-amd64- ci/879 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-i386- ci/880 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- runner- vivid-mako/ 2366 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 2738 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 2738/artifact/ work/output/ *zip*/output. zip s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/touch- flash-device/ 20412
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild: s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/unity8- ci/5714/ rebuild
http://