Merge lp:~aacid/unity8/avila_apps_scope into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti on 2016-01-22 |
| Approved revision: | 2118 |
| Merged at revision: | 2164 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~aacid/unity8/avila_apps_scope |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
174 lines (+10/-46) 6 files modified
qml/Components/ResponsiveGridView.qml (+2/-4) qml/Dash/CardGrid.qml (+1/-0) qml/Dash/GenericScopeView.qml (+2/-1) tests/mocks/Unity/fake_categories.cpp (+1/-1) tests/qmltests/Components/tst_ResponsiveGridView.qml (+0/-36) tests/qmltests/Dash/tst_GenericScopeView.qml (+4/-4) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~aacid/unity8/avila_apps_scope |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unity8 CI Bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2016-01-22 | |
| Michael Zanetti (community) | Approve on 2016-01-22 | ||
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2016-01-22 | |
| Michael Terry | 2016-01-13 | Approve on 2016-01-13 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Better looking application scopes for wide screens
Removes the maximum number of columns as discussed with Design it doesn't make sense and made the cards a bit wider
Description of the Change
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
Paty says "Looks alright I guess"
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
PASSED: Continuous integration, rev:2115
https:/
Executed test runs:
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/
| Michael Terry (mterry) wrote : | # |
LGTM. Can't argue with "Looks alright I guess"
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
Yes!
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
| Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote : | # |
Actually some of the tests failed, I would not listen to unity8-ci-bot just yet.
- 2116. By Albert Astals Cid on 2016-01-14
-
Merge unity8
- 2117. By Albert Astals Cid on 2016-01-14
-
Fix genericscopeview tests now that the 6 column limit has disappeared
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
PASSED: Continuous integration, rev:2117
https:/
Executed test runs:
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2117
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
- 2118. By Albert Astals Cid on 2016-01-22
-
Specify min spacing for the apps scope on wide screens
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2118
https:/
Executed test runs:
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2118
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
Verified it doesn't change small size screens (like phones). Visuals on larger screens (flo & frieza) approved by Paty and Vesa.
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
as much as we'd expect
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2118
https:/
Executed test runs:
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/

FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2115 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- ci/7053/ jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- vivid-touch/ 6006 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- xenial- touch/468/ console jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-phablet- qmluitests- vivid/1758 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- qmluitest- xenial- amd64/461 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-amd64- ci/1653 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- vivid-i386- ci/1653 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- xenial- amd64-ci/ 460 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity8- xenial- i386-ci/ 459 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- runner- vivid-touch/ 4641 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 6017 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- vivid-armhf/ 6017/artifact/ work/output/ *zip*/output. zip s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/touch- flash-device/ 26605 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- deb-autopilot- runner- xenial- touch/216/ console jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- xenial- armhf/466 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ generic- mediumtests- builder- xenial- armhf/466/ artifact/ work/output/ *zip*/output. zip s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/touch- flash-device/ 26606
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
FAILURE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild: s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/unity8- ci/7053/ rebuild
http://